VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Vijayalakshmi v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 21647/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.03.2026.

¶2Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 23.03.2026 before the respondents, requesting for cancellation of no objection certificate issued to the respondents 4 & 5 and for issuance of patta in favour of the petitioner. However, the said Page3 of 5 representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the representation filed by the petitioner dated 23.03.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa Page4 of 5 To

¶1The District collector Office of collectorate, Salem District.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, attur taluk, Salem District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, attur taluk, Salem District. WPoNo.o21647oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o21647oofo2026 11-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Vijayalakshmi W/o.Late.Subramani, No.277/A1-Gandhi nagar, Attur taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Office of collectorate, Salem District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aattur taluk, Salem District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Attur taluk, Salem District. 4. Ramasamy S/o.Pachamuthu Keezha street, kolaiyanur, ulliyakkudi, ammbappur, Ariyalur District - 621701. 5. Chinnathambi S/o.Sivaperumal, kalpaganur village, attur taluk, Salem District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 23.03.2026 seeking cancellation Page2 of 5 of the no objection certificate and related proceedings issued in favour of respondents 4 and 5 and grant patta in favour of the petitioner to her property in survey no.241/1 to an extent of about 76 cents and survey no.241/3 to an extent of about 60 cents in kalpanur village, attur taluk, Salem District on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Rajakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt's counsel for R1 to 3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.