VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V. Vimal Kumar Gupta v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 21095/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.05.2025.

¶2Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 23.05.2025 before the official respondents, requesting them to survey and mark the boundaries of the subject land. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the official respondents till date. Hence, this petition.

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. Page3 of 5

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.05.2025 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey and laying boundary stones at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.

¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the official respondents are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the jurisdictional police station. In such case, the concerned Police officer shall provide all necessary protection to the official respondents till the completion of survey at the subject land. Page4 of 5

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, South Chennai Division, Guindy, Chennai.-600 032

¶2The Tahsildar Thiruvottriyur Taluk Office, Chennai District -600 019 WPoNo.o21095oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o21095oofo2026 10-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY V. Vimal Kumar Gupta S/o. Vidhayadhar Gipta. Old No.45, New No.20, Kasthuri Rangan Road, Alwarpet, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, South Chennai Division, Guindy, Chennai.-600 032 2. The Tahsildar Thiruvottriyur Taluk Office, Chennai District -600 019 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing to conduct a comprehensive survey and measurment of the petitioners entire property which an extent of 1.825 Acres (79.497 Sq.ft) in S.No.224/1 situated at Ennore High Road, Kaladipet, Chennai-600 019 For Petitioner(s): Ms.Makeswari.P. For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt's Cl. Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.