VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Vairakannu v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 21214/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 12.03.2026.

¶2Ms.Inthu Karukanaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, initially, the petitioner's father had purchased the subject property at Survey No.151/7, to an extent of 26¾ cents of land, vide sale deed dated 17.10.1955. Thereafter, the petitioner's father had passed away on 01.12.1976. Now, a representation was filed by the petitioner for transfer of patta. However, the said Page3 of 6 representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

¶5In reply, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that at present, the patta, pertaining to the subject land, stands in the name of one Valarmathi. However, the petitioner is relying upon the sale deed, executed in the year 1955 and claiming his right over the subject property. As per the revenue records, subsequent to the said deed, two transactions had occurred, pertaining to the said property, in the year 1977 & 2026. In such case, unless and otherwise those transactions were set aside, the patta will not be transferred in favour of the petitioner.

¶6Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In the case on hand, a representation was filed by the petitioner for transfer of patta based on the sale deed dated 17.10.1955. According to the respondent, now, the patta, pertaining to the subject land, stands in the name of one Valarmathi. Further, as per the revenue records, subsequent to the said deed, two transactions had occurred, pertaining to the very same subject property. Page4 of 6

¶8In such case, as rightly contended by the respondent, unless and otherwise those transactions were set aside, the patta will not be transferred in the name of petitioner. Now, the right course available to the petitioner is to challenge the registration of aforesaid sale deeds in the manner known to law. The representation for transfer of patta will not be entertained unless and otherwise, a decree is obtained from any Court of law in favour of the petitioner.

¶9In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a suit before an appropriate Civil Court and establish his right over the subject property.

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The District Collector Collector Office, Cuddalore district , Cuddalore 607 001

¶2The Revenue Divisional officer Revenue Divisional office, Page5 of 6 Vridhachalam division , Vridhachalam , Cuddalore district 606 001

¶3The Tahsildar Vridhachalam taluk office, Vridhachalam taluk, Cuddalore district 606 001 WPoNo.o21214oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o21214oofo2026 11-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Vairakannu S/o. Late. Kathirvelu, No. 6/51 Middle street, Therkiruppu, Iruppu post, Vridhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore district 607 805 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collector Office, Cuddalore district , Cuddalore 607 001 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Revenue Divisional office, Vridhachalam division , Vridhachalam , Cuddalore district 606 001 3. The Tahsildar Vridhachalam taluk office, Vridhachalam taluk, Cuddalore district 606 001 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioners application for sub division and Patta transfer bearing Application No. 2026 /0105/ 18/ 010589 dated 12.03.2026 in respect of the property comprised in Survey No. 151/7A situated at Iruppu village, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore district within such time frame as may be Page2 of 6 fixed by this Honble court and consequently direct the respondents to effect necessary mutation in the revenue records, including patta and passbook entries in respect of the said property in the names of the legal heirs of Late. Shri Kathirvelu including the petitioner in accordance with law and pass For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Elumalai For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt's Cl.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.