- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 June 2025
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 17501/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P. Velmurugan
Judgment
ORDER This petition is filed to transfer the investigation in Crime No.16 of 2024 pending on the file of the second respondent-Police to the CB.CID Police or any other investigating agency.
¶2By order dated 18.06.2025, this Court closed this petition based on the submission of the learned Government Advocate that after completion of investigation in Crime No.16 of 2024, charge sheet has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram on 28.03.2025 itself.
¶3This Court, by the very same order dated 18.06.2025, also directed as follows: "3. Registrar General is directed to call for a report from the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram as to whether charge sheet dated
28.03.2025 in Crime No.16 of 2024 filed by the respondent-Police has been taken on file or not. If not, the Registry is directed to call for explanation
from the Judicial Magistrate concerned and file a report before this Court on 14.07.2025.
¶4List the matter on 14.07.2025 for filing the report."
¶4Subsequently, the Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, by letter dated
26.06.2025 ( in D.No.1099/2025), had stated as under: "1. I humbly submit the remarks as called for in the reference cited in C.O.No.306/2025. The charge sheet in Crime No.16/2024, on the file of the All Women Police Station, Rasipuram, was filed through the e-filing portal of the Judicial Magistrate Court on 08.04.2024. Upon scrutiny, the same was not taken on file, and objections were raised on
21.04.2025 due to the non-uploading of the required documents.
¶2I further humbly submit that upon perusal of the e-filing records, it is seen that on 03.04.2025, two files were uploaded and on 09.04.2025, two separate files were uploaded. However, the charge sheet and the connected documents were uploaded as a single file instead of separate files in OCR format. None of the parameters laid out in the Madras High Court e-filing Rules 2020, were
followed. Additionally, the 161 Cr.P.C Statement of Witness No.7 mentioned in the witness list and the Domestic Welfare Officer's report were not filed.
¶3I further humbly submit that in the month of April 2025, the last date of document filed by the Investigating Officer was 09.04.2025. From the next day, i.e., 10.04.2025 to 14.04.2025, were public holidays. The period from 15.04.2025 to
17.04.2025 were working days, followed by holidays from 18.04.2025 to 20.04.2025. On
21.04.2025, the file was returned after scrutiny.
¶4As on date, the returns have not been complied with by the Investigating Officer, nor has the file been re-presented. Furthermore, the Investigating Officer has not appeared before the court on any date to represent the status of filing or to clarify the reason for the return.
¶5This is submitted for your Honour's kind consideration."
¶5From the above report of the Judicial Magistrate, Rasipuram, it is clear that the respondent-Police, while filing the charge-sheet, have not
followed the e-filing Rules formulated by this Court and it was returned on several occasions.
¶6However, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that the defect pointed out by the learned Magistrate, was subsequently ratified and the case is taken on file in C.C.No.273 of of 2025.
¶7The above report of the Magistrate, dated 26.06.2025, is hereby recorded.
14.07.2025 cs To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, Namakkal District.
¶2State Rep. by Inspector of Police, AWPS, Rasipuram, Rasipuram, Namakkal District. Cr.No.16 of 2024.
¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
P.VELMURUGAN, J cs
14.07.2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 14.07.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- B.Bhuvaneswari, W/o Raj Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, Namakkal District. 2. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, AWPS, Rasipuram, Rasipuram, Namakkal District. Cr.No.16 of 2024. .. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of the BNSS praying to transfer the investigation in Cr.No.16 of 2024 pending on the file of the second respondent-Police to the CB.CID Police or any other investigating agency. For petitioner : M/s.T.Sundaravadanam For respondents: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.