VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Kathiravan v. State Represented By, Inspector of Police,

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 June 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
CRL MP 9237/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of sentence of imprisonment, imposed by the learned Fast Track Court Exclusively to deal with Offences under the POCSO Act at Puducherry, in Spl.SC.No.46 of 2024, vide judgment dated 14.05.2026.

¶2The conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner/appellant, vide impugned judgment are as follows:- Under Section Sentence 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

¶3The submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/appellant are as follows:- Page2 of 6

3.1. The Petitioner was charged for the offence under Section 8 of POCSO Act, 2012. The offence said to have taken place on 06.07.2024, at that time, the victim was aged about 17 years and the petitioner himself was aged about 27 years.

3.2. There are arguable points available in the Criminal Appeal, which is unlikely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and the petitioner/appellant has a fair chance of succeeding in the appeal.

3.3. The fine amount has been paid by the petitioner/appellant. The trial Court has already suspended the sentence imposed on the petitioner/appellant till 12.06.2026. Hence, the sentence imposed on the petitioner/appellant may be suspended.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Pondy) appearing for the respondent opposed for the grant of suspension of sentence stating that the trial Court, after taking into consideration the oral and documentary evidence produced by the prosecution, rightly found the petitioner/appellant guilty and convicted and sentenced him, as stated above. Page3 of 6

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner/appellant. Accordingly, till the disposal of the appeal, the relief suspension of sentence is granted to the petitioner/appellant, subject to the following conditions:- "

(i) The petitioner/appellant shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each, with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Fast Track Court Exclusively to deal with Offences under the POCSO Act at Puducherry;

(ii) The petitioner/appellant shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders." Page4 of 6

¶7Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Vv To

¶1The Fast Track Court Exclusively to deal with Offences under the POCSO Act at Puducherry

¶2The Inspector of Police, Thirukkanur Police Station, Puducherry.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page5 of 6 CRLoMPoNo.o9237oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. VV CRLoMPoNo.o9237oofo2026 in CRLoAoNO.o682oOFo2026 09-06-2026 Page6oofo6 Page7 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN IN CRL A NO. 682 OF 2026 Kathiravan S/o.Kanagaraj, No.12, Indhira Nagar, Chettipet Colony, Puducherry. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by, Inspector of Police, Thirukkanur Police Station, Puducherry.. Crime No.88/2024 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous is filed under Section 430(1) r/w 483 of BNSS Act, 2023, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in Spl.S.C.No.46 of 2024, on the file of the learned Fast Track Court Exclusively to deal with Offences under the POCSO Act at Puducherry and enlarge the petitioner on bail by allowing this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and thus render Justice. Page1 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr..Swami Subramanian For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Alexander, Government Advocate (Pondy)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.