- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 June 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 21585/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 19.02.2026.
¶2Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the 4th respondent.
¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 19.02.2026 before the respondents 1 to 3, requesting them to survey the subject land. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the official respondents till date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 5
¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the concerned respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 19.02.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.
¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the official respondents are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the Page4 of 5 4th respondent. In such case, the 4th respondent shall provide all necessary protection to the respondents till the completion of survey at the subject land.
¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To
¶1The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
¶2The Head Surveyor Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
¶3The Village Administrative Officer Gunagarambakkam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
¶4The Inspector of Police Sunguvarchatram Police Station, Kanchipuroam District. WPoNo.o21585oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o21585oofo2026 11-06-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Thiruvengadam S/o. Elumalai Naikar, Gunagarambakkam, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. 2. The Head Surveyor Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. 3. The Village Administrative Officer Gunagarambakkam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District. 4. The Inspector of Police Sunguvarchatram Police Station, Kanchipuroam District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to survey the Petitioners property in old Survey No.62 New Survey No.,169/2 measuring an extent of 6.26 Ares at Kunakarampakkam Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk and Kancheepuram District, fix its boundaries as per the Sale deed No.1706/1970 by Page2 of 5 obtaining adequate police protection from the 4th Respondent, within the period that may be stipulated by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Ms. E.Yuvarani For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt's counsel, for R1 to 3 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, GA for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.