VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Doraisamy v. The Collector,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 June 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 21775/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "To call for the records relating to the impugned order passed in Na.Ka.No.10919/2024/A2dated 31.03.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to take immediate action against the respondents 3 to 5 be taken by placing Page3 of 6 under suspension, following the departmental proceedings who have issued illegal/bogus patta."

¶2The petitioner claims ownership and possession of 2.14 acres of land in S.No.664/3A, South Avinashipalayam Village. He alleges that certain third parties illegally obtained patta in their names with the help of revenue officials, without issuing notice to him or conducting the enquiry as contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act and Rules. He alleges that certain third parties illegally obtained patta in their names with the help of revenue officials, without issuing notice to him or conducting the enquiry contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act and Rules. Aggrieved by the issuance of patta, the petitioner sought information under the Right to Information Act, filed a statutory appeal and also approached this Court in W.P.No.32259 of 2025. As no action was taken despite the directions issued by this Court on 04.09.2025 in W.P.No.32259 of 2025, he initiated contempt proceedings in Cont.P.No.996 of 2026. During the pendency of the contempt petition, the first respondent had passed the impugned order dated 31.03.2026. Challenging the said order, the present writ petition has been filed. Page4 of 6

¶3Heard the learned counsels on both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶4Admittedly, the impugned order has been passed without giving a proper opportunity to the petitioner and also appears to have been passed to get over the contempt proceedings that had been initiated against the first respondent. This fact has also been noted by this Court in its order dated

01.04.2026 in Cont.P.No.996 of 2026.

¶5In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 31.03.2026 is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the first respondent for fresh consideration, who shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 to 5, afford them an opportunity to submit their explanations, and thereafter pass orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SRN Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur. WPoNo.o21775oofo2026 P.T.ASHAoJ. SRN WPoNo.o21775oofo2026 AND WMPoNO.o23597oOFo2026 16-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP No. 23597 OF 2026 S.Doraisamy, ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur. 3. Raja Kumar, previously working as Tahsildar, Tiruppur south, now he is working as highway Tahsildar, O/o.Collectorate, Tiruppur. 4. Arul kumar, previously working as Deputy Tahsildar, Tiruppur South, Now he is working as Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, RDO Office, Tiruppur. Page2 of 6 5. Ramya, previously working as village administrative officer, south avinasipalayam, now she is working as village administrative officer, Ramapuram revenue village, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed in Na.Ka.No.10919/2024/A2dated 31.03.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to take immediate action against the respondents 3 to 5 be taken by placing under suspension, following the departmental proceedings who have issued illegal/bogus patta. For Petitioner(s): Mr. V.Elangovan For Respondent(s): Mr. A.R. Balaji, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.