VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Dr.M.Balaji v. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Its

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 January 2026
Bench
T. Vinod Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP 18968/2020

Follow Madras High CourtFollow T. Vinod Kumar

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.01.2026

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.Nos.18968 of 2020 & 14148 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.23523 of 2020 and 15026 & 15027 of 2021 Dr.M.Balaji

... Petitioner in both petitions vs

¶1The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. …first respondent in both petitions

¶2The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Office of the Registrar, Chennai – 600 051.

¶3The Chairman, University Grants Commission, New Delhi – 110 003.

¶4The Chairperson, National Commission for Scheduled Tribe, New Delhi – 110 003.

… Respondents in W.P.No.18968/2020

¶5The Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Rep. By its Registrar, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai – 600 051. … Second Respondent in W.P.No.14148/2021 Prayer

in W.P.No.18968/2020

: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to reserve a seat for the Scheduled Tribe (ST) community and consider the name of the petitioner under the ST quota for the above post viz., Assistant Professor in the subject of Animal Nutrition as per notification Advertisement No.3/2020 (Recruitment of Assistant Professors – 2020) on the file of the second respondent dated 06.07.2020 and pass orders. Prayer in W.P.No.14148/2021: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the second respondent's Advertisement No.1/2021 dated

30.06.2021, to quash the same insofar as the non-inclusion of ST vacancy and the said category therein is concerned and to consequently direct the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner to the post of Assistant Professor and to pass orders. P For Petitioner in :Ms.K.Jeenath Begam W.P.No.18968/2020 for Mr.S.Doraiswamy

For Petitioner in :Ms.B.Sneha W.P.No.14148/2021 for Mr.L.Chandrakumar

For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi in both petitions Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.S.Vijayakumar for R2

For Respondents in : Dr.G.Babu W.P.No.18968/2020 Central Government Standing Counsel for R4 No Appearance for R3

C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petitions does not survive for consideration and thus, the writ petitions have become infructuous.

¶2Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petitions are closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition are closed. No costs.

08.01.2026 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh To

¶1The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶2The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Office of the Registrar, Chennai – 600 051.

¶3The Chairman, University Grants Commission, New Delhi – 110 003.

¶4The Chairperson, National Commission for Scheduled Tribe, New Delhi – 110 003.

¶5The Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Rep. By its Registrar, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai – 600 051. T. VINOD KUMAR

, J.

dh

08.01.2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.