VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Singaram v. The State Rep By, the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 15224/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

18.03.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 118(1) and 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.133 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner/first accused suspected his wife of having an illicit relationship with the defacto complainant and, in connection therewith, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant using a knife. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioners have been in custody since 18.03.2026 and are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, fairly submitted that the petitioners have no bad antecedents and that the investigation has already been completed and the charge sheet is yet to be filed.

¶5Considering the above facts and circumstances, particularly the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, the fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, and also the fact that the investigation has already been completed and the charge sheet is yet to be filed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

17.06.2026 skr Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur

¶2The Superintendent, Women Prison, Salem

¶3The Superintendent, District Prison, Dharmapuri

¶4The Inspector of Police, Harur Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

¶5The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr

17.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1. Singaram 2. Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Harur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.133 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.133 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Swamisubramanian For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.