VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ashanthkumar v. The State Represented by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 June 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 14782/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.05.2026, seeking bail in Crime No.311 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 310(4) of BNS, seeks bail. Page No.1 of 5

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused attempted to commit dacoity. Hence, the case.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.Learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Counsel for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the nature of allegations and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties ( out of which, one shall be a blood related Page No.2 of 5 surety), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., and 05.30.p.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

11.06.2026 Sma Page No.3 of 5 Copy to:

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri

¶2The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Tiruvallur.

¶3The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal -II.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page No.4 of 5 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

, J.

sma

11.06.2026 Page No.5 of 5

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Ashanthkumar ... Petitioner/A1 Vs. State by:- The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Tiruvallur. (Crime No.311 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.311 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Dhanasekar For Respondent : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.