VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Gowtham Feeds, v. The State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 June 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
23189/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Judgment

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP.Nos.25140, 25141, 25145, 25167 & 25172 of 2026 M/s.Gowtham Feeds, Represented by its Proprietor Tvl.Marimuthu Selvaraju No.2/112-1, Thokkathampalayam Thummangurichi PO Namakkal 637003 GSTIN 33BDHPS4649Q1ZQ. ..Petitioner in both WPs. Vs

¶1The State Tax Officer Namakakl (Town) Assessment Circle, No 67/7, Integrated Commercial Tax building, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 637 001.

¶2The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Namakkal Town Assessment Circle, No.67/7 1st floor Integrated Commercial Tax Building, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 637 001. ..Respondents in W.P.No.23189 of 2026 The State Tax Officer Namakakl (Town) Assessment Circle, No 67/7, Integrated Commercial Tax building, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 637 001. .. Respondent in W.P.No.23213 of 2026 Prayer in W.P.No.23189 of 2026 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent pertaining to impugned order passed in GSTIN : 33BDHPS4649Q1ZQ/2018-19 dated 21.11.2025, Page2 of 4 quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to consider the matter afresh after providing opportunity of hearing and in the light of the judgment rendered by this Honble Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in Tvl.RPG Traders Vs. State Tax Officer in W.P. (MD) No.35398 of 2025 dated

12.12.2025, to dispose the case on merits. Prayer in W.P.No.23213 of 2026 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the Respondent pertaining to impugned order passed in GSTIN : 33BDHPS4649Q1ZQ/2021-22 dated 08.04.2025, quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to consider the matter afresh after providing opportunity of hearing and in the light of the judgment rendered by this Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in Tvl.RPG Traders Vs. State Tax Officer in W.P. (MD) No.35398 of 2025 dated

12.12.2025, to dispose the case on merits. In both WPs. For Petitioner: Mr. S. Rajesh For Respondents: Mr. R. Sethu Prabakaran Government Counsel (Tax) COMMON ORDER In both these writ petitions, the impugned orders are assailed insofar as it pertains to the imposition of general penalty.

¶2Relying on M/s.Kandan Hardware Mart rep. By its Proprietor E.Palani vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Park Town Page3 of 4 Assessment Circle, Chennai – 600 003 [(2026) 38 Centax 332 (Mad.)] (Kandan Hardware) and other cases, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general penalty under Section 125 of applicable GST statutes cannot be imposed in cases wherein late fee has been levied.

¶3Mr. R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4In order to maintain consistency in approach, following Kandan Hardware, the orders impugned herein are set aside only insofar as imposition of general penalty is concerned.

¶5These writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 29-06-2026 Index : Yes/No KJ Page4 of 4

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ To

1.The State Tax Officer Namakakl (Town) Assessment Circle, No 67/7, Integrated Commercial Tax building, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 637 001.

2.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Namakkal Town Assessment Circle, No.67/7 1st floor Integrated Commercial Tax Building, Mohanur Road, Namakkal 637 001. and WMP.Nos.25140, 25141, 25145, 25167 & 25172 of 2026 29-06-2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.