VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

A.P.Killiparamanandhavalavan v. A.S.Nataraja Gounder -Died

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 June 2025
Bench
R.Sakthivelauthor
Case no.
CMP 17013/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Sakthivel

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMP.Nos.17013, 17021 & 17028 of 2023 in A.S.No.291 of 2016

¶1A.P.Killiparamanandhavalavan

¶2P. Akila Maheswari

¶3S. Thilagavathy

¶4Vedhanayagi

... Petitioners / Appellants in all CMPs Vs. A.S.Nataraja Gounder (died) A.S.Amaravathi Gounder (died)

¶1Suganya

¶2Manickam

¶3A.N.Jayalakshmi

¶4A.N.Sivasubramanian

¶5A.N. Vijayan ... Respondents / Respondents 3 to 7 in all CMPs

¶6Mrs. Saraswathi

¶7Mrs. Rajarajeshwari

¶8Mrs. Mangaiyarkarasi

¶9Mrs.Deepa ... Proposed respondents 8 to 11 / Legal Heirs of deceased 2nd respondent / Respondents 6 to 9 in all CMPs PRAYER IN

CMP.No.17021 of 2023

: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 860 days in filing to set aside abatement of the above appeal in so far as the second respondent in concerned caused due to his death. Page No.1 of 4 PRAYER IN CMP.No.17028 of 2023 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of CPC, praying to set aside the abatement of the above appeal in so far as the second respondent is concerned caused by his death. PRAYER IN CMP.No.17013 of 2023 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC, praying to bring on record the respondents 6 to 9 viz., Mrs. Saraswathi, Mrs. Rajarajeshwari, Mrs. Mangaiyarkarasi and Mrs. Deepa, the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent as respondents 8 to 11 in the above appeal.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Asokan in all CMPs For Respondents : Mr.M. Rajasekar in all CMPs COMMON ORDER CMP.No.17021 of 2023 has been filed to condone the delay of 860 days in filing the set aside abatement of the above appeal in so far as the second respondent in concerned caused due to his death.

¶2CMP.No.17028 of 2023 has been filed to set aside the abatement of the above appeal in so far as the second respondent is concerned caused by his death. Page No.2 of 4

¶3CMP.No.17013 of 2023 has been filed to to bring on record the respondents 6 to 9 viz., Mrs. Saraswathi, Mrs. Rajarajeshwari, Mrs. Mangaiyarkarasi and Mrs. Deepa, the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent as respondents 8 to 11 in the above appeal.

¶4Heard Mr.R.Asokan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.M. Rajasekar, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶5On being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions and considering the submissions made on either side, these petitions stand allowed.

18.06.2025 av Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the appeal papers.

Page No.3 of 4 CMP.Nos.17031, 17021 & 17028 of 2023 in A.S.No.291 of 2016 R.SAKTHIVEL,oJ. av o CMP.Nos.17013,o17021o&o17028oofo2023 ino oA.S.No.291oofo2016o CMAoNOS.423oANDo828oOFo2021 18o/o06o/o2025 (1/4) Page No.4 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.