VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Selvi Arumugam v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 23304/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents1 and 2 to survey and fix boundary stones to the petitioner's land as per the challan, dated

05.04.2026

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a request to survey and fix the boundary stones of the her land situated in Villupuram district, Vikravandi taluk, Iyankoilpattu village, in Survey No.484/10A to an extent of 2.8600 Ares, as per Challan No.2026/N123/07/000724, dated 05.04.2026 and direct the third respondent to give proper police protection to enable the second respondent to measure the land. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and submitted that the petitioner's request will be considered within a period of eight weeks.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the Page3 of 4 petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents 1 and 2 and carry out a survey and complete the process within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving prior notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved parties, if any. It is open to the respondent to request for police protection before jurisdictional police. If any such request is made, the jurisdictional police is directed to provide an adequate police protection for conducting the survey.

¶6It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondents to conduct a survey and lay boundary stones at the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court.

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The Tahsildar, Vikravandi, Villupuram District.

¶2The Surveyor, Vikravandi, Villupuram District.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Vikravandi, Villupuram District. 19-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Selvi Arumugam ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Vikravandi, Villupuram District. 2. The Surveyor, Vikravandi, Villupuram District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Vikravandi, Villupuram District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and fix the boundary stones of the petitioner's land situated in Villupuram District, Vikravandi Taluk, Iyankoilpattu Village, in Survey No.484/10A in this an extent of 2.8600 Ares, as per Challan No.2026/N123/07/000724 and direct the 3rd respondent to give proper police protection to enable the 2nd respondent to measure the land. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.Sarveswaran For Respondent(s) : Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government's Counsel, for RR-1 and 2 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), for R3 Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.