- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 July 2026
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP 24569/2026
Judgment
ORDER An order dated 10.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
¶2Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
¶3On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 10% pre-deposit was made while lodging the appeal. On instructions, he submits further that an additional 15% would be remitted as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. Page3 of 4
¶5Subject to the petitioner remitting an additional 15% of the tax demand under the impugned order within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of an additional 15% of the disputed tax demand.
¶6The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RNA To
¶1The Deputy State Tax Officer MMDA colony Assessment Circle No 88, 2nd Floor, mayor Ramanathan Salai, Chetpet, Chenani 031
¶2The Deputy Commissioner ST GST Appeals II C.T. Annexe Building, 3rd Floor No.1, Greams Road, Thousand Lights Chennai, Tamilnadu 600 006 Page4 of 4
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA and W.M.P.No.26795 of 2026 09-07-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.26795 of 2026 Touch Group Designs Represented by its partner Mr. Palaniyappan 11/5, Annasami Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai. Tamilandu - 600 094 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy State Tax Officer MMDA colony Assessment Circle No 88, 2nd Floor, Mayor Ramanathan Salai, Chetpet, Chenani 031 2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)GST Appeals II C.T. Annexe Building, 3rd Floor No.1, Greams Road, Thousand Lights Chennai, Tamilnadu 600 006 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, Calling for the records relating to the impugned order in DRC 07 bearing Reference No ZD331225156221W dated 10.12.2025 along with detailed orders dated 10.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same as the same being arbitrary, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 265 of the Constitution and subsequently Page2 of 4 direct the Respondent to lift the back attachment made vide Recovery Notice dated 16.04.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N. Sri Prithvi Reddy For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) ***********
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.