VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Srinath v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 23230/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's applications dated 03.03.2023 and 11.05.2026, respectively.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made an applications dated 03.03.2023 and 11.05.2026, before the respondents to modify the entries in Survey No.39, 40/1, 41 and 58/4 of Siddanapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri district and to implement order of the 3rd Respondent in ROC.UDR 19/88/H dated 09.09.1988 and to restore the Patta for lands in S.No.39, 40/1, 41 and 58/4 of Siddanapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District to total extend of 4.33 cents on perusal of the documents and revenue records and in terms of Section 10 of Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 read with Rule 4(7) of Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Rules 1987. However, the said applications were not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner's applications dated

03.03.2023 and 11.05.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. Page3 of 4

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's applications dated

03.03.2023 and 11.05.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The District Collector, O/o. District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Collector Office, Krishnagiri.

¶3The Sub Collector, O/o. The Sub Collector Office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶4The Tahsildar Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 19-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY R.Srinath ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, O/o. District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Collector Office, Krishnagiri. 3. The Sub Collector, O/o. The Sub Collector Office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 4. The Tahsildar Office Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose of Application dated 03.03.2023 and 11.05.2026 for modification of entries in Survey No.39, 40/1, 41 and 58/4 of Siddanapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri district and to implement of the 3rd Respondent order dated in ROC.UDR 19/88/H dated 09.09.1988 and to restore the Patta for lands in S.No.39, 40/1, 41 and 58/4 of Siddanapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District to total extend of 4.33 cents on perusal of the documents and revenue records and in terms of Section 10 of Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 read with Rule 4(7) of Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Rules 1987. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Elumalai For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government's Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.