VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Muthamizharasan v. State Rep.By

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 15235/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which are pari materia to Sections 153A, 506, 341, and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, Page2 of 5 1860, in Crime No.128 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners assaulted and attacked the de facto complainant. Due to which, the de facto complainant sustained injuries. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that entire issue erupted in furtherance of a parking dispute. He further submitted that this is a case of case and case in counter and that the petitioners have assaulted the de facto complainant by iron rod. He further submitted that the injured person has been discharged after three days. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Page3 of 5

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, taking into consideration of the totality of the circumstances and upon the fact that the injured person has been discharged from hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The Page4 of 5 learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of fifteen days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 17-06-2026 SHL To:

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar

¶2The Sub-Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station

¶3The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras CRLoOPoNo.o15235oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPANoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o15235oofo2026 17-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1. Muthamizharasan 2. Mohan 3. Devaraj ..Petitioners Vs State rep.by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Cr.No.128 of 2026. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the event of arrest of petitioners by police for the reasons stated in the petition, in connection with the case in Cr.No.128 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners: Mr.Anbharasu A For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.