M.Saravanan v. M.Vasudevan

Page No.1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP Nos. 3690, 3710 & 3712 of 2026 AND CMP Nos. 16042, 16109 & 16211 OF 2026 M.Saravanan ..Petitioner in all CRPs Vs

1.M.Vasudevan ... Respondent in C.R.P.No.3690 of 2026

2.M.Mohanavel ... Respondent in C.R.P.No.3710 of 2026

3.M.Sivakumar ... Respondent in C.R.P.No.3712 of 2026 Prayer in

: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 17.12.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No. 48 of 2025 on the file of the III Additional District Judge at Salem. Prayer in

CRP No. 3710 of 2026

: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 17.12.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.53 of 2025 on the file of the 3rd Additional District Judge at Salem. Prayer in

CRP No. 3712 of 2026 :

Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 17.12.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.45 of 2025 on the file of the 3rd Additional District Judge at Salem. Page No.2 of 4 In all CRPs : For Petitioner: Mr.S.Ramajayam For Respondents: Mr.S.Arjun ***** COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed challenging the impugned orders all dated 17.12.2025 passed in I.A.Nos.1, 1 & 1 of 2025 in O.S.Nos.48, 53 & 45 of 2025 on the file of III Additional District Court at Salem.

¶2Under the aforesaid orders, the applications filed by the petitioner/plaintiff seeking attachment before judgment of the petition scheduled property have been dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, these revision have been filed.

¶3As seen from Order XLIII Rule 1(q) CPC, the impugned orders are appealable order. Hence, if aggrieved by the same, the petitioner will have to file appeal before the appropriate appellate court and not file a revision.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty for the petitioner to file appeal before the appropriate appellate court as against the impugned orders. No Page No.3 of 4 prejudice would be caused to any of the parties, if such a liberty is granted to the petitioner.

¶5Accordingly, since these revisions are not maintainable, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before the appropriate appellate court as against the impugned orders and the time spent by the petitioner before this Court through these revisions shall stand excluded for the purpose of saving limitation u/s 14 of the Limitation Act. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶6Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned orders, which are the subject of these revisions to the learned counsel for the petitioner, enabling the petitioner to file appeal before the appellate court having jurisdiction. 16-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sp To The III Additional District Court at Salem. Page No.4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. sp CRP Nos. 3690, 3710 & 3712 of 2026 AND CMP Nos. 16042, 16109 & 16211 OF 2026 16-07-2026