VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Siraj Basha v. The State Rep By, the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 15520/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

11.05.2026 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 309(4) and 311 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons took the de-facto complainant near a secluded place, and robbed a sum of Rs.41,500/-, two mobile phones, and a two-wheeler. Pursuant to the investigation, the petitioner was arrested and remanded in judicial custody. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an auto driver, who drives an auto-rickshaw on a rental basis for his livelihood, and that he is innocent. He further submits that the alleged complaint is false, as the de-facto complainant had merely lost his phone and immediately suspected the petitioner. He also submits that the petitioner has been in continuous incarceration since 11.05.2026, that he will abide by any condition imposed by this Court, and therefore prays for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Counsel (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner and reiterates the case of the prosecution. However, he submits that there is no previous case recorded against the petitioner, and further confirms that the robbed amount has already been recovered. Page3 of 6

¶5Though the learned Government Counsel objects to the bail application, this Court takes into consideration the fact that the petitioner has no adverse antecedents and that the robbed amount has been recovered. Taking note of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, and also the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner since 11.05.2026, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Vellore and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before respondent Police daily at 10:30 a.m., for a period of 15 days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate Page4 of 6 action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dpa Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Vellore.

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.

3.The Inspector of Police, Vellore North Crime Police Station, Vellore.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o15520oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. dpa CRLoOPoNo.o15520oofo2026 19-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Siraj Basha ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police Vellore North Crime Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No.28 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.