Ms. Zam Zam Medicals v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)(Fac)

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP Nos. 25366 to 25368 of 2026 In both WPs. M/s. Zam Zam Medicals (Rep by its proprietor Mr.Sujath ali) 271/1, Dhali Road, Udumalpet, Tiruppur 642126. ..Petitioner Vs

¶1The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Udumalpet(South), Assessment circle, Tiruppur.

¶2The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Palladam – 2, GST Appeal, Tiruppur. ..Respondents Prayer in W.P.No.23405 of 2026: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent herein in Form GST DRC 07 vide Reference No. ZD331125144399D along with its detailed order vide GSTIN 33AJNPS2210A1ZS both dated 10.11.2025 for the tax period April 2021 - March 2022, quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.23407 of 2026: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the 2nd Respondent herein in Form GST APL 02 dated 09.03.2026, quash the same and while directing the 2nd Respondent to re-dispose the appeal filed by the Petitioner in Form GST Page2 of 4 APL 01 dated 14.02.2026 arising out of the order of the 1st Respondent in Form GST DRC 07 vide Reference No. ZD331125144399D dated 10.11.2025 on merits. In both WPs. For Petitioner: Mr. K.A.Parthasarathy For Respondents: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) COMMON ORDER In these two writ petitions, order in original dated 10.11.2025 and appellate order dated 14.02.2026 are challenged.

¶2Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of both the respondents.

¶3The order in original was issued without hearing the petitioner. The appeal was lodged within the condonable period.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pre-deposit of 10% of the tax demand was made while lodging the appeal. Subject to giving credit thereto, he submits that additional amounts would be remitted so that 25% of the disputed tax demand under the order in original is remitted in the aggregate. Page3 of 4

¶5Subject to the petitioner remitting additional amounts so as to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand in the aggregate (after giving credit to 10% pre-deposit made by the petitioner while filing the appeal) within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the order in original is set aside and the matter is remanded to the assessing officer for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand in the aggregate.

¶6These writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 01-07-2026 Index : Yes/No KJ To

¶1The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Udumalpet(South), Assessment circle, Tiruppur.

2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Palladam – 2, GST Appeal, Tiruppur. Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. KJ and WMP Nos. 25366 to 25368 of 2026 01-07-2026