VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Naveen Kumar v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 July 2026
Bench
Hemant Chandangoudarauthor
Case no.
WP 28116/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

O R D E R Mr. P. Siddarth, learned Government Counsel, accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3 and 5 to 7. Mr. P. Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the fourth respondent.

¶2The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to consider his representation dated 24.11.2025. In the said representation, the petitioner requested the authorities to direct the fourth respondent to remove the road allegedly laid over his property and to direct the third respondent to issue a patta in respect of the subject property.

¶3The petitioner claims to be the owner of Plot No.2, measuring 1,440 sq.ft., in Survey No.74, Periyakuppam Village, Thiruvallur District.

¶4According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent has laid a road over the said property without following due process of law, thereby violating his right to property guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.

¶5The learned Government Counsel, on instructions, submits that the Page Nos.4/6 petitioner's representation will be considered in accordance with law within such time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶6Recording the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conduct a survey of the subject property, with the assistance of the third respondent, in the presence of the petitioner and the fourth respondent. If, upon such survey, it is found that the road has been laid on the petitioner's patta land, the second respondent shall pass appropriate orders for removal of the unauthorised road, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

22.07.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk Page Nos.5/6 To

¶1The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration No.100, Pattinampakkam Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate Chennai-600 028.

¶2The District Collector District Collectorate Office Jaya Nagar, Near Campus Office Chinna Ekkaddu, Tiruvallur – 602 001.

¶3The Tahsildar JN Road, 184/12B, NH 716 Jaya Nagar, Kakkallur,

¶4The Commissioner Thiruvallur Municipality Office No.56, JN Road, 184/12B, NH 716 Jaya Nagar, Kakkallur,

¶5The Revenue Inspector Barathiyar Street, SP Nagar Kakkallur, Thiruvallur – 602 001.

¶6The Sub-Registrar Sub-Registrar Office 184/12G, NH 50, Punkathur

¶7The Village Administrative Officer The Village Administrative Office (Incharge – Periyakuppam Village) JN Road, Kakkallur, Thiruvallur 602 001. Page Nos.6/6 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk

22.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page Nos.1/6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR R.Naveen Kumar S/o.Rajkumar ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration No.100, Pattinampakkam Santhome High Road, Foreshore Estate Chennai-600 028. 2. The District Collector District Collectorate Office Jaya Nagar, Near Campus Office Chinna Ekkaddu, Tiruvallur – 602 001. 3. The Tahsildar JN Road, 184/12B, NH 716 Jaya Nagar, Kakkallur, 4. The Commissioner Thiruvallur Municipality Office No.56, JN Road, 184/12B, NH 716 Jaya Nagar, Kakkallur, Page Nos.2/6 5. The Revenue Inspector Barathiyar Street, SP Nagar Kakkallur, Thiruvallur – 602 001. 6. The Sub-Registrar Sub-Registrar Office 184/12G, NH 50, Punkathur 7. The Village Administrative Officer The Village Administrative Office (Incharge – Periyakuppam Village) JN Road, Kakkallur, Thiruvallur 602 001. … Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 3rd respondents to consider the representation dated 24.11.2025 requesting the fourth respondent to remove the road laid over the petitioner's property and direct the 3rd respondent to issue a patta for his property. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Elankumaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Siddarth Government Counsel, for R1 to R3, R5 to R7 Mr.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel, for R4 ***** Page Nos.3/6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.