- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 June 2025
- Bench
- M. Sundar, Hemant Chandangoudar
- Case no.
- WP 21014/2024
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar
Judgment
ORDER [made by M.SUNDAR, J.] At the threshold, it is apropos to write that we have noticed that the two notices, both dated 02.07.2024, which are called in question in the captioned 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity], have been issued invoking the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 (Act 9 of 1999) but the prayer portions in the captioned WP and captioned writ miscellaneous petition being W.M.P.No.22966 of 2024 erroneously read that the captioned WP assails notices issued under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905). However, in the same breath, it has also to be pointed out that the prayer portion of the writ affidavit mentions the name of the statute correctly.
¶2Be that as it may, read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on
26.07.2024 which reads as follows: 'W.P.No.21014 of 2024 Page Nos.2/6 and W.M.P. No.22966 of 2024 M.SUNDAR,J., K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.) Captioned writ petition talks about Survey No.545/4H and 4C, Door No.124/37, Elango Street, Mulluvadi Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District but when the matter was taken up, Mr.M.S.Palanisamy, learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the writ petitioner is concerned with T.S.No.34/1.
¶2Faced with the above situation, learned counsel for writ petitioner sought time to do course correction. Request acceded to.
¶3List after three weeks. List on 16.08.2024 in the Admission Board i.e., Motion List. If the amendment petition is filed in the interregnum, that may be listed. (M.S.J.) (K.G.T.J.)
26.07.2024'
¶3Adverting to earlier proceedings dated 26.07.2024 extracted and reproduced above, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner submits that amendment petition has not been filed [To be noted, nearly 11 months have elapsed from the last listing]. Faced with this situation, learned counsel sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned WP but made a plea to preserve the rights of writ petitioner to file a fresh writ petition adverting to the survey number Page Nos.3/6 which the writ petitioner is concerned with and other attendant details, including the amendment qua name of the statute discussed in the opening paragraph. A scanned reproduction of the endorsement made in the case file is as follows: Request acceded to. Page Nos.4/6
¶4In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP and captioned writ miscellaneous petitions thereat stand disposed of as withdrawn/closed, albeit with preservation of writ petitioner's rights in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (H.C., J.)
12.06.2025 cad To
¶1The District Collector Salem District Salem
¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Taluk Salem District
¶3The Tahsildar Attur Taluk Salem District
¶4The Commissioner Attur Municipality Attur Salem District Page Nos.5/6
M.SUNDAR, J.
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cad
12.06.2025 Page Nos.6/6
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.21014 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.22963 & 22966 of 2024 C. Angammal Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Salem District Salem 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Taluk Salem District 3. The Tahsildar Attur Taluk Salem District 4. The Commissioner Attur Municipality Attur Salem District Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the 4th respondent relating to two notices issued under Section 128(1)(b) of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment, 1905 in Na.Ka.No.2142/2023/F1 dated 02.07.2024 in respect of Survey No.545/4H & 4C, Door No.124/37, Page Nos.1/6 Elango Street, Mulluvadi Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District and quash the same. For petitioner Ms. J. Lingitha
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.