VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2024 › High Court of Madras

M/S Vasanta Bhavan Hotels India Private Limited v. Hotel Jain Vasantha Bhavan

DECREED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 June 2024
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
C.S(COMM DIV) 236/2023

Judgment

J U D G M E N T The suit has been filed seeking for (i) permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their men, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff Trade Mark and Trading style ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' by using the offending Trade Mark and Trading style ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' or any other mark or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's Trade Mark ''VASANTA BHAVAN''; (ii) permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their men, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under them from in any manner Passing-off the plaintiff Trade Mark and Trading style ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' by using the offending Trade Mark and Trading style ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' or any other mark or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's Trade Mark ''VASANTA BHAVAN''; (iii) directing the defendant to render a true and faithful account of the profits earned by them through the sale of food products bearing the offending trade mark ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' and directing payment of such profits to the plaintiff by way of damages for infringement committed by the defendant; (iv) directing the defendant to surrender to plaintiff the entire stock of unused offending goods with Trade Mark ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' with name boards, labels, wrappers, boxes, covers, bags, packets, cartons, bills, advertisements, materials, reports, envelops, brochures, printing blocks etc., bearing the offending Trademark for destruction; and for costs.

2.1. It is the case of the plaintiff/Company that one Late Muthukrishnan, who is the father of M.Ravi and grandfather of Anand Krishnan, entered into the hotel business in the year 1974 under the name and style ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' and they are running chain of Hotels in all over the world mainly in Tamil Nadu and they are also running restaurants along with the prefix ''Namma Veedu Vasanta Bhavan'' also. The essential feature of the plaintiff's trademark is ''VASANTA BHAVAN''. On account of long, continuous and extensive use of their unique trademark, tremendous amount of goodwill and reputation had accrued in favour of the plaintiff's trademark for the past 50 years. Further, several newspapers/magazines have carried articles about the plaintiff's Hotel and they have also invested a substantial sum of money in order to create the awareness among the public with regard to the high-quality hotel ''VASANTA BHAVAN''.

2.2. It is stated that the trademark and trading style ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' has acquired the secondary meaning to denote and connote the product of the plaintiff, which assures the public a unique taste and standard in the food preparations. Further, the Registrar of Trademarks, Government of India, Mumbai had issued the certificate of registration on 15.07.2021 for the mark ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' in the name of the plaintiff/Company. The plaintiff has also obtained the legal usage certificate, dated 19.04.2022 from the Trademark Registry, Intellectual Property Building, Guindy, Chennai. It is clearly mentioned in the said certificate that the plaintiff's trademark was used since 30.10.1974 and the said registration is valid till 15.07.2031. It is further stated that plaintiff has also obtained certificate of registration on 27.01.2012 for the trademark ''NAMMA VEEDU VASANTA BHAVAN'' and also obtained Legal usage certificate on 19.04.2022, in which, it was clearly mentioned that the plaintiff's trademark ''NAMMA VEEDU VASANTA BHAVAN'' was used since 30.10.1974 and the said registration is valid till

27.01.2032. It is further stated that some unscrupulous traders, wanting to take illegal advantage and enrich themselves at the popularity and reputation of the plaintiff, are now resorting to adopt the said trademark and trading style '' VASANTA BHAVAN'' or ''VASANTHA BHAVAN'' or ''VASANTHAM'' for their hotels and restaurant business. Except the plaintiff no one has any right to use the said trademark and/or trading style.

2.3. It is the case of the plaintiff that they came to know that the defendant is dishonestly using the mark as ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'', which is deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's trademark and trading style. The defendant adopted the identical trademark and trading style ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' only to deceive the general public and to make them believe the food preparations served at the defendant's place, has the connection with the plaintiff's hotel and the defendant is associated with the plaintiff. The defendant has no manner of right to adopt and use the said offending trademark and/or trading style as ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN''. If the defendant is allowed to continue the illegal acts in adopting the plaintiff's celebrated trademark and vend food preparations under the offending trademark, the plaintiff would be put to irreparable loss, hardship and injury. Apart from the loss, the plaintiff's also fear that their well-earned reputation would be spoiled by the substandard foods being served at the defendant's business premises. It is further stated that the acts of the defendant also constitute criminal offences under the Trademark Act, 1999.

2.4. It is the further claim of the plaintiff that the defendant has made a clear attempt to pass-off their goods as that of the plaintiff's, by adopting the mark ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'', which is visually, structurally, phonetically and deceptively identical to that of the plaintiff's trademark ''VASANTA BHAVAN''. Hence, the plaintiff has sent a Cease and Desist notice, dated 06.04.2023 and the same was received by the defendant on 19.04.2022. However, the defendant neither sent a reply notice nor had taken steps to change their hotel's name. The defendant is infringing the plaintiff's trademark, which is not permissible under law and hence, the plaintiff has filed the present suit for injuncting the defendant from using the infringing trademark ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN''.

¶3Since the defendant has not filed written statement, the defendant was set ex-parte by this Court on 03.06.2024.

¶4On the side of the plaintiff, the Authorized Signatory of the plaintiff/Company, Mr.R.Jayaprakash, was examined as P.W.1 and he has reiterated the averments made in the plaint and also marked 45 documents as Exs.P1 to P45.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff and perused the materials available on record.

¶6On a perusal of the plaint averments and also Proof Affidavit of the plaintiff and documents marked on behalf of them, this Court finds that the suit claim is proved by the plaintiff, and hence, the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as sought for in the plaint. Accordingly, the suit is decreed as prayed for, with costs. Consequently, connected pending applications, if any, are closed.

28.06.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms List of Witness examined on the side of the plaintiffs R.Jayaprakash - PW1 List of documents marked on the side of the plaintiffs SL. Exhibits DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENTS DATED

¶1P1 Photocopy of the Lease Deed to run the restaurant named Vasanta Bhavan

26.10.1974

¶2P2 Printout of the Paper advertisement in Dinamani of the inauguration of plaintiff's restaurant at Egmore, Chennai

30.10.1974

¶3P3 Photocopy of the Lease Deed to run the restaurant named Vasanta Bhavan

19.10.1979

¶4P4 Printout of the Paper advertisement in The Hindu Paper

06.04.1984

¶5P5 Photocopy of the Lease Deed to run 04.10.1984 the restaurant named Vasanta Bhavan

¶6P6 Printout of the Paper Advertisement in Maalai Malar

15.07.1987

¶7P7 Photocopy of the receipt received by Krishna Agro Industries Corporation in the name of Vasanta Bhavan

14.12.1987

¶8P8 Photocopy of the receipt received by Krishna Agro Industries Corporation in the name of Vasanta Bhavan

15.12.1987

¶9P9 Photocopy of the letter received by Krishna Agro Industries Corporation in the name of Vasanta Bhavan

15.12.1987

¶10P10 Printout of the Paper Advertisement in The Hindu

20.10.1989

¶11P11 Photocopy of the Lease Deed to run the restaurant named Vasanta Bhavan

15.10.1989

¶12P12 Photocopy of the plaint filed by M.S.Tourist Homes Private Limited

02.01.1995

¶13P13 Photocopy of the Vasanta Bhavan inauguration advertisement

19.09.1997

¶14P14 Printout of the Incorporation Certificate of plaintiff

07.11.2003

¶15P15 Photocopy of the advertisement bill issued by Amudha Surabhi

10.11.2004

¶16P16 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Dinamalar Newspaper

01.01.2005

¶17P17 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Dinamalar Newspaper

13.02.2005

¶18P18 Printout of the Advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Murasu Newspaper

16.03.2005

¶19P19 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Malar

17.03.2005 Newspaper

¶20P20 Photocopy of the advertisement bill issued by Maalai Malar

17.03.2005 P21 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Murasu Newspaper

13.04.2005 P22 Photocopy of the advertisement bill issued by Maalai Murasu

13.04.2005

¶23P23 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Murasu Newspaper

18.04.2005

¶24P24 Photocopy of the advertisement bill issued by Maalai Murasu

18.04.2005

¶25P25 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Murasu Newspaper

24.03.2005

¶26P26 Photocopy of the advertisement bill issued by Maalai Murasu

24.03.2005

¶27P27 Photocopy of the advertisement bill for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Murasu Newspaper

19.05.2005

¶28P28 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in Maalai Murasu Newspaper

25.05.2005

¶29P29 Photocopy of the advertisement bill issued by Maalai Murasu

25.05.2005

¶30P30 Printout of the advertisement for Vasanta Bhavan in The Hindu Newspaper

02.07.2005

¶31P31 Printout of the advertisement for the plaintiff Hotel dated 2005

¶32P32 Printout of the advertisement for the plaintiff Hotel dated 2005

¶33P33 Photocopy of the certificate issued in the name of the plaintiff by Tamil

23.01.2018 Nadu Food Safety and Drugs and Administration Department

¶34P34 Printout of the ISO Certificate issued in the name of Vasanta Bhavan

22.08.2018

¶35P35 Photocopy of the Trademark Registration Certificate in the name of Vasanta Bhavan

23.12.2021

¶36P36 Board Resolution

06.06.2024

¶37P37 Printout of the Legal usage Certificate in the name of Vasanta Bhavan

19.04.2022

¶38P38 Printout of the Legal usage Certificate in the name of Namma Veedu Vasanta Bhavan

19.04.2022

¶39P39 Photocopy of the Certificate issued by the Chartered Accountant with regard to the turnover from 2003 to 2021

08.08.2022

¶40P40 Photocopy of the Cease and Desist notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendant

06.04.2023

¶41P41 Photocopy of the Inauguration Photo of the plaintiff Hotel by Actor Rajinikanth

¶42P42 Photocopy of the plaintiff Hotel ''Vasanta Bhavan'' by politicians, celebrities and businessman

¶43P43 Printout of the photograph of the plaintiff Hotel

¶44P44 Printout of the photograph of the defendant Hotel

¶45P45 Photocopy of the Comparison chart of plaintiff and defendant Hotel.

28.06.2024 P.VELMURUGAN, J ms C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.236 of 2023

28.06.2024

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 28.06.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Civil Suit (Comm.Div.) No. 236 of 2023 M/s.Vasanta Bhavan Hotels India Private Limited Represented by its Director Mr.Anand Krishnan Having its office at No.34 Developed Plots (South Phase) Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ... Plaintiff Vs. Hotel Jain Vasantha Bhavan No.474 + R26, Gingee – Tindivanam Road Kalayiyur, Tamil Nadu – 604 206. ... Defendant Plaint has been filed under Order VII Rule I of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order IV, Rule 1 of High Court Original Side Rules and Sections 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and plaint numbered as C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.236 of 2023 praying for judgment and decree as follows : a) granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their men, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing the plaintiff Trade Mark and Trading style ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' by using the offending Trade Mark and Trading style ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' or any other mark or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's Trade Mark ''VASANTA BHAVAN''. b) granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, their men, servants, agents or anyone claiming through or under them from in any manner Passing-off the plaintiff Trade Mark and Trading style ''VASANTA BHAVAN'' by using the offending Trade Mark and Trading style ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' or any other mark or marks which are similar or in any way deceptively similar to or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's Trade Mark ''VASANTA BHAVAN''. c) directing the defendant to render a true and faithful account of the profits earned by them through the sale of food products bearing the offending trade mark ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' and directing payment of such profits to the plaintiff by way of damages for infringement committed by the defendant. d) directing the defendant to surrender to plaintiff the entire stock of unused offending goods with Trade Mark ''HOTEL JAIN VASANTHA BHAVAN'' with name boards, labels, wrappers, boxes, covers, bags, packets, cartons, bills, advertisements, materials, reports, envelops, brochures, printing blocks etc., bearing the offending Trademark for destruction. e) directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff the costs of the suit. For Plaintiff : Mr.Vijayan Subramanian For Defendant : Set ex-parte on 03.06.2024 --------

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.