VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Gopalan v. The Thasildhar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 23164/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's online applications dated 17.03.2026 and 27.03.2026, respectively.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made an online applications dated 17.03.2026 and 27.03.2026 to conduct survey Demarcation and place boundary stones and complete the process with respect of the property comprised in survey No.5/1E1C1 at an extent of Hect.0-1.38 Ares and in survey No.94/8D1B, at extent of Hect.0-4.46 ares situate at Sithapattinam Revenue village, Manalurpet post, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 and submitted that the petitioner's applications dated 17.03.2026 and 27.03.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. Page3 of 4

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's online applications dated

17.03.2026 and 27.03.2026 and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved parties, if any within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent to conduct a survey and lay boundary stones at the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court.

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The Thasildhar, Vanapuram Taluk, Pagandai kootu salai, Kallakurichi District.

¶2The Firka surveyor, Land survey, Office of vanapuram Taluk, Pagandai kootu Salai, Kallakurichi District. 19-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Gopalan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Thasildhar, Vanapuram Taluk Pagandai kootu salai, Kallakurichi District. 2. The Firka surveyor, Land survey, Office of vanapuram Taluk, Pagandai kootu Salai, Kallakurichi District. 3. P.Sakthivel 4. P.Moorthi 5. P.Sivakumar 6. A.Rani ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 2 herein to conduct survey Demarcation and place boundary stones and complete the process within specified period with respect of the property comprised in survey No.5/1E1C1 at an extent of Hect.0-1.38 Ares and in survey No.94/8D1B, at extent of Hect.0-4.46 ares situate at Sithapattinam Revenue village, Manalurpet post, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District through consider and dispose off the petitioner's applications vide Nos.1)2026/0123/33/001164 dated 17.3.2026 Page2 of 4 and 2)2026/0123/33/001295 dated 27.3.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Ramesh For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Government's Counsel for R1 & 2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.