VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Navodaya Mass Entertainments Ltd., v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 23942/2026

Judgment

Order This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2025 to the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to verify, identify and locate the petitioner's land measuring 56 cents comprised in S.No.410/13A1, in Varadharajapuram Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, in accordance with the title deeds and thereafter, issued a revised patta and FMB and pass such other orders.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased Acre 0.75 Cents in S.No.410/1, Varadharajapuram Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District by way of Sale Deed dated

22.08.1990 in Doc.No.4348/1990 and also converted revenue records in his name. The petitioner has given 19 cents in S.No.410/1 and retained 56 cents and was given patta No.9202 for only Acre 0.33 cents out of the above said Acre 0.56 cents with sub divided survey No.410/13A1. The petitioner has filed an application before the 2nd respondent dated 20.09.2025 for survey of the property and also sent a representation dated 25.09.2025 to the 1st respondent to check, verify and locate our land measuring Acre 0.56 cents in S.No.430/13A1 as per the Title Deeds and issue a revenue Patta and FMB and since no action Page3 of 4 was taken by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition.

¶3In reply, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the application and representation of the petitioner will be disposed of by the first respondent within a period of twelve weeks.

¶4Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials on record.

¶5In view of the above, this Court, without expressing anything on merits, directs the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2025 after due notice to the petitioner and other interested parties and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 24-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Sk Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. Sk To

¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the revenue divisional officer, sriperumbudur.

¶2The Tahsildar kundrathur taluk, sriperumbudur district.

¶3The Surveyor Kundrathur Taluk, Sriperumbudur District.

¶4The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records Kancheepuram and Chengalpattu. 24-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Navodaya Mass Entertainments Ltd., By its Managing Director MR.Jose Punnoose, Having registered office at Navodaya Lands, varadarajapuram, Dharkas Ward-II, Chennai - 600132. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the revenue divisional officer, sriperumbudur. 2. The Tahsildar kundrathur taluk, sriperumbudur district. 3. The Surveyor Kundrathur Taluk, Sriperumbudur District. 4. The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records Kancheepuram and Chengalpattu. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 25.09.2025 of the petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to verify, identify and locate the petitioners land measuring 56 cents comprised in S.No.410/13A1, at varadharajapuram village, kundrathur taluk, kancheepuram district in accordance with the title deeds and thereafter issue a revised patta and FMB. For Petitioner(s): R.Sankarakutralingam Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.