- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 July 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 26698/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024.
¶2Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.
¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. Page3 of 5
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 14.10.2024 before the respondents 1 to 3, requesting them to cancel the patta, pertaining to the subject land at Survey Nos.678/1 & 682, issued in favour of the 4th & 5th respondents and to issue fresh patta, pertaining to subject land at Survey Nos.678/1, 682 (Part) & 683/2 in petitioner's name. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents 1 to 3 till date. Hence, this petition.
¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.10.2024 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5
¶8With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To
¶1The Additional P.A.to the District collector(LA) Chennai District Chennai-600 001
¶2The Revenue Divisional officer South Chennai Division Guindy, Chennai-600 032
¶3The Tahsildar Mylapore-Triplicane Taluk chennai-600 028 WPoNo.o26698oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o26698oofo2026 13-07-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY P.R.Sundarvadhanan Old No.71, New No.161, Swami Naicken street Chintadripet, Chennai-600 002 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Additional P.A.to the District collector(LA) Chennai District Chennai-600 001 2. The Revenue Divisional officer South Chennai Division Guindy Chennai-600 032 3. The Tahsildar Mylapore-Triplicane Taluk chennai-600 028 4. E.Sasikumar S/o.P.L.D.Elumalai No.13, Gengu Reddy street Egmore chennai-600 008 5. S.Gomathy W/o.E.Sasikumar No.13, Gengu Reddy Street Egmore chennai-600 008 ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith cancel the Patta No.7 in respect of survey Nos.678/1 and 682 at Chintadripet village Mylapore-Triplicane Taluk, chennai obtained by the respondents 4 and 5 by forging order of the HOnble Supreme court dated 12.11.1997 in Civil appeal Nos.7674 and 7675 of 1997 and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to issue patta for 780 sq.ft in the name of the petitioner for survey Nos.678/1, 682(Part) and 683/2 situated at chintadripet village,Mylapore -Triplicane Taluk, chennai For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt.counsel for R1 to 3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.