VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Anandhi v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 July 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 1582/2026

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide adequate police protection to carry out the fencing of the my property comprised in Survey No.89/21 to a total extent of 5 Ares at Kolanaiyakanpatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District, which has already been surveyed by the revenue authorities representation dated 20.05.2026. Page3 of 5

¶2It is seen that the petitioner purchased the property comprised in Survey No.89/21, to a total extent of 5 Acres at Kolanaickenpatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District, by way of a registered sale deed dated

02.06.2025, registered as Document No.2550 of 2025. This being the case, respondents 3 to 6 attempted to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. Therefore, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition before this Court in W.P. No.30604 of 2025 seeking police protection to survey the land. As directed by this Court, police protection was provided to the surveyor, and the land was surveyed. Now, the petitioner seeks police protection to fence the land. If there is any dispute between the petitioner and respondents 3 to 6 regarding the land, they ought to have approached the Civil Court.

¶3The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that upon the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent registered an FIR in Crime No.67 of 2026 against the petitioner, and an FIR in Crime No.68 of 2026 against respondents 3 to 6. Both complaints are currently pending investigation.

¶4In view of the above, the police protection sought by the petitioner for a civil dispute cannot be considered. The 2nd respondent is directed to complete the investigation and file a final report within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5

¶5With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 08-07-2026 SMA To

¶1The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

¶2The Inspector of Police, Mettur Police Station

¶3The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Page5 of 5

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA 08-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Anandhi W/o. Mariyappan, No.5/203, Kolanaiyakanpatti Village, ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, 2. The Inspector of Police, Mettur Police Station 3. Perumal S/o.Kandhasamy, Residing at Kolanaiyakanpatti Villag e, 4. Marigoundan S/o.Kandhasamy, Residing at Kolanaiyakanpatti Villag e, 5. Thandavan S/o.Kandhasamy, Residing at Kolanaiyakanpatti Villag e, Page2 of 5 6. Arumugam S/o. Marimuthu, Residing at Kolanaiyakanpatti Villag e, ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide adequate police protection to carry out the fencing of the my property comprised in Survey No.89/21 to a total extent of 5 Ares at Kolanaiyakanpatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District, which has already been surveyed by the revenue authorities representation dated 20.05.2026 within a stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Deepakkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government for R1 & R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.