VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Manish v. The State Rep.By

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 15902/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

15.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime Number.112 of 2026 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail. Page2 of 6

¶2It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 6.150 kilograms Ganja. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 15.05.2026 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and fairly submitted that the contraband seized was of a intermediate quantity and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

¶5Taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner since 15.05.2026, the fact that the contraband seized is of intermediate quantity, and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the learned Page3 of 6 Judicial Magistrate-IV, Salem, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

24.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dpa Page4 of 6 Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To

1.The learned Judicial Magistrate-IV, Salem

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem.

3.The Inspector of Police, PEW-Mettur Police Station, Salem District

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o15902oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. dpa CRLoOPoNo.o15902oofo2026

24.06.2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Manish ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, PEW-Mettur Police Station, Salem District Crime No.112 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.112 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.L.Ramanathan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.