VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Bharat Kumar P.Shah v. The Chairman and Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 38824/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WP NO. 38827 OF 2024 Bharat Kumar P.Shah S/o Mr. Pukhraj R. Shah, No 962 D-56 4th Floor, Chennai 600 084. Petitioner in W.P.No.38824 of 2024 Kishore Kumar P. Shah S/o Mr. Pukhraj K. Shah, No 1089 Poonamallee High Road, Sankeshwara Secrenity Apt, B-Block 1401 Chennai 600 084. Petitioner in W.P.No.38827 of 2024 Vs

1.The Chairman And Managing Director, TACID, State Industries Promotion, Corporation Of Tamil Nadu Limited, No 18-A Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Chennai 600 008.

2.The District Collector, First Floor, Collectorate, Kancheepuram 631 501.

3.The Special Thasildar, Special Thasildar (LA) Sipcot Unit 2, Pillaipakkam Sriperumbudur, Expansion Scheme -2, Sriperumbadur 602 105.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram (District) Kancheepuram.

5.The Land Acquisition Officer, Tamil Nadu Urban Development Plan, Alandur, Chennai 600 016. Respondents in both W.Ps PRAYER in

WP No. 38824 of 2024:-

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 09.12.2022 and to direct the land acquisition officer to measure the property in Survey No 144/2, measuring 25 cents out of 4.26 acres, Punja Agricultural Land situated at No 174 Vadakal Village, within the registration district of Chengalput and Registration Sub-District of Sri peruambuthur and release the unused property to the petitioner. PRAYER in

WP No. 38827 of 2024:-

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 09.12.2022 and to direct the land acquisition officer to measure the property in Survey No 144/2, measuring 25 cents out of 4.26 acres, Punja Agricultural Land situated at No 174 Vadakal Village, within the registration district of Chengalput and Registration Sub-District of Sri peruambuthur and release the unused property to the petitioner. For Petitioners in both W.Ps: Mr.S.Edhin Frank For Respondents in both W.Ps: Mr.Abishek Murthy Standing Counsel For R1 Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan Additional Government Pleader For R2 to R5 COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 09.12.2022 and to direct the land acquisition officer to measure the property in Survey No 144/2, measuring 25 cents out of

4.26 acres, Punja Agricultural Land situated at No 174 Vadakal Village, within the registration district of Chengalput and Registration Sub-District of Sri Peruambuthur and release the unused property to the petitioner.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners land were acquired for the development of SIPCOT Sripermbathur Expansion Scheme – II. Though the petitioner objected the acquisition, a call letter has been sent by the 3rd respondent for the acquisition of the petitioners land and also to get compensation. Subsequently an enquiry has also been conducted. While the petitioners were fighting for compensation, the SIPCOT has fixed the stones for a portion of property required by them and a portion of property is left over without being used. Therefore, the petitioners made their representations dated 09.12.2022, requesting the 1st respondent to direct the land acquisition officer to measure the petitioners' properties and to release the unused property to the petitioners. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

3.Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 to 5, would submit that the representations of the petitioners dated 09.12.2022 will be considered, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 to 5.

5.Considering the submissions made by either parties and in view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondents 3 and 5, to consider the petitioners representations dated 09.12.2022, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the aforesaid directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. 10-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The Chairman And Managing Director, Tacid, State Industries Promotion, Corporaiton Of Tamil Nadu Limited, No 18-A Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Chennai 600 008.

2.The District Collector, First Floor, Collectorate, Kancheepuram 631 501.

3.The Special Thasildar, Special Thasildar (LA) Sipcot, Unit 2 Pillaipakkam Sriperumbudur, Expansion Scheme -2, Sriperumbadur 602 105.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram (District), Kancheepuram.

5.The Land Acquisition Officer, Tamil Nadu Urban Development Plan Alandur, Chennai 600 016. WPoNo.o38824oofo2024 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. rst WPoNo.o38824oofo2024 ANDoWPoNO.o38827oOFo2024 10-03-2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.