- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 July 2026
- Bench
- D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- CRL OP 17212/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the final report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.20 of 2026.
¶2Upon perusal of the final report and other material records of the case, the allegations is that after the bank had taken possession and the property was being guarded by Security guards, the Petitioners and others have threatened them and abused them in filthy language and used dangerous weapons and broke opened the seal and trespassed into the property.
¶3The learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the falsity of the complaint is manifest from the fact that originally, the Petitioners' father was bedridden on the date of incident. However, upon realizing the falsity of their case, the Respondent Police dropped the name of the Petitioners' father from the final report. Further, it must be seen that the keys were handed over by the Security guards and were never forcibly taken. Since the Petitioners are Page2 of 5 asserting their rights over the property, criminal trespass cannot be pre-maturely concluded by the Respondent Police.
¶4I have considered the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
¶5The arguments that are made in the nature of factual offence and as such, to be taken only during the course of the Trial and cannot be considered by this Court as incontrovertible facts so as to entertain a quash petition.
¶6However, considering the age of the parties, the background of the case and the hardship pleaded, I am of the view that the personal appearance of the Petitioners before the Trial Court except for the hearings where the Trial Court may insist upon their presence shall stand dispensed with.
¶7In view thereof, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to raise all disputes during the course of the Trial. No costs. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 06-07-2026 jas Page3 of 5 To
1.The Judicial Magistrate, Kodumudi, Erode District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kodumudi Police Station, Erode District.
3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Page4 of 5 CRLoOPoNo.o17212oofo2026 D.BHARATHAoCHAKRAVARTHY,oJ. jas Crl.O.P.No.17212oofo2026 and Crl.M.P.No.11477oofo2026 06-07-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17212 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.11477 of 2026 1.Sivakumar S/o. Sakthivel, 29, Anna Illam, Kodumudi Byepass Road, Kodumudi, Erode. 2.Gayathri D/o.Sakthivel, 29, Anna Illam, Kodumudi Byepass Road, Kodumudi, Erode. 3.Revathy W/o. Senthilkumar, D.No.5, Main Street, Chennasamudram, Erode 638 151. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Rep by Inspector of Police, Kodumudi Police Station, Erode District. 2.P.C.Pramoth S/o.Chellapan Nair, The Branch Manager, Karnataka Bank Limited, Oppanakara Street Branch, Coimbatore. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5 Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and to quash the Final report in CC.No.20 of 2026 dated 11.02.2026 on the file of Judicial Magistrate at Kodumudi, Erode District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.V.Logeswaran For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.