- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2026
- Bench
- G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
- Case no.
- WP Crl. 1769/2026
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the 4th respondent, the Inspector of Police, CCB, Chennai City Police Commissioner
Office,
Chennai,
in
his
order
in C.No.1350/CCB/COP/Visitors/2025, dated 17.02.2026, without proper enquiry and investigation conducted by the 4th respondent and to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct fresh investigation properly appointing fittest police officials of the 3rd respondent and expeditiously and proceed in accordance with law.
¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.
¶3The learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the complaint lodged by the petitioner was enquired and closed by the respondents/police.
¶4In view of the above, the complaint lodged by the petitioner was enquired and closed by the respondents/police by an order dated 17.02.2026. Further, while closing the complaint, the petitioner was directed to approach the Real Estate Regulatory Authority or the Competent Civil Court for appropriate relief. Since the entire allegations are that the petitioner had paid substantial amount to the promoter, even then the petitioner was not handed over possession of the constructed flat. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the Closure Report dated 17.02.2026.
¶5Accordingly, the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned jurisdictional Civil Court by way of filing private complaint, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
28.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dm To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police Commissioner, Chennai.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, CCB, Chennai City Police Commissioner Office, Chennai.
3.The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Chennai City Police Commissioner Office, Chennai.
4.The Inspector of Police, CCB, Chennai City Police Commissioner Officer, Chennai.
5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
, J.
dm
28.07.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.P.MP.Crl.Nos.627, 628 and 629 of 2026 Geethanjali Amuthasakaran … Petitioner vs. 1.The Govt. of Tamilnadu rep. by its Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police Commissioner, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, CCB, Chennai City Police Commissioner Office, Chennai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime, Chennai City Police Commissioner Office, Chennai. 4.The Inspector of Police, CCB, Chennai City Police Commissioner Officer, Chennai. … Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 4th respondent the Inspector of Police, CCB, Chennai City Police Commissioner Office, Chennai, in its order in C.No.1350/CCB/COP/Visitors/2025 dated 17.02.2026, without proper enquiry and investigation conducted by the 4th respondent and quash the same and further directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct fresh investigation properly appointing fittest police officials of the 3rd respondent and expeditiously and proceed in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajagopal for M/s.R.Jansirani For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.