VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Thangavel v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 24248/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to measure the lands comprised in Survey No.457/3B of Kannappalli Page2 of 4 Village, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District and lay the necessary boundary stones within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner made an application on 29.08.2025 seeking to measure and fix boundaries of the petitioner's property in Survey No.457/3B, situated at Kannappalli Village, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District. Since the same was not considered the respondents 2 and 3, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶3Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's Counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the petitioner's application dated 29.08.2025 will be considered and disposed of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government's Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶5Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's application dated 29.08.2025 and conduct a survey and demarcate the subject properties, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt Page3 of 4 of a copy of this order, after issuing prior notice to the petitioner and the other parties concerned, if any. If any need arises for Police assistance, it is open to the respondents 2 and 3 to request for Police protection from the jurisdictional Police. If any such request is made, the jurisdictional Police is directed to provide an adequate Police protection for conducting the survey.

¶6It is made clear that this order is passed solely for the purpose of directing respondents 2 and 3 to conduct a survey and demarcate the subject property. If any dispute arises regarding the possession of the property, it must be resolved by filing a suit before a competent Civil Court. In the event of a title dispute, official respondents shall not take possession of the property and hand it over to any party. It is up to the parties concerned to seek recovery of possession through the due process of law.

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 24-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SRM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. SRM To

¶1The District Collector, Erode District, Erode.

¶2The Tashildar Anthiyur Taluk, Anthiyur, Erode District.

¶3The Taluk Surveyor, Survey Section, Anthiyur Taluk, Anthiyur, Erode District. 24-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Thangavel .. Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Erode District, Erode. 2. The Tashildar Anthiyur Taluk, Anthiyur, Erode District. 3. The Taluk Surveyor, Survey Section, Anthiyur Taluk, Anthiyur, Erode District. .. Respondents PRAYER:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to measure the lands comprised in Survey No.457/3B of Kannappalli Village, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District and lay the necessary boundary stones within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Lakshmanasamy For Respondents : Mr.M.Guruprasad Government's Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.