VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Prakash v. The State Rep By, Inspector of Police,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 July 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 17926/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.849 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, which escalated into violence. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and a false case has been foisted. He would also submit that a counter case has been given against the defacto complainant. He would further submit that the petitioners are ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays for the grant of anticipatory bail.

¶4Though the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would oppose the anticipatory bail application by reiterating the prosecution case, would fairly submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is of the firm view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvottiyur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the Page3 of 5 police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that: [a] If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for suretyship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period two weeks and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation. [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [g] If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

10.07.2026 smv Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvottiyur.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Inspector of Police, H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Chennai – 600 019.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN

,J.

smv Crl.O.P.No.17926 of 2026

10.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.17926 of 2026 1.R.Prakash 2.R.Chandru ... Petitioner(s)/A1 & A3 Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Chennai – 600 019. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.849 of 2023, on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.Jaganathan For Respondent(s) : Mrs.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.