VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Annapoorani v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 24319/2022

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER The relief sought in the present Writ Petition is to direct the Respondents 1 to 5 to take an appropriate action against the Respondents 6 to 8 and their associates based on the Petitioner's Representation dated 08.08.2022 and submit the report before this Court, within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.

¶2The case of the Petitioner is that Respondents 6 to 8 had defrauded her by receiving a sum of Rs.9,09,000/- from her under the pretext that they would implement the Ayushman Bharath Prathan Manthri Jan Arogya Yojana Insurance Scheme. Hence, she submitted a Representation dated 08.08.2022 before the Respondents 1 to 5, requesting them to set up a special investigation team to investigate the matter and take appropriate action against the Page4 of 6 Respondents 6 to 8 who have been cheating the general public and exploiting their hard earned money under the guise of implementing the Central Government's Welfare Schemes, particularly, Ayushman Bharath Prathan Manthri Jan Arogya Yojana Insurance Scheme and also, requesting them to pass an order to refund the Petitioner a sum of Rs.9,09,000/- defrauded by the Respondents 6 to 8. However, even after the receipt of Petitioner's Representation dated 08.08.2022, Respondents 1 to 5 have not taken any action against the Respondents 6 to 8. Therefore, left with no other alternative, Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the relief stated supra.

¶3There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.

¶4Heard the learned Special Government Pleader appeared on behalf of Respondents 1, 2 & 5 and the learned counsel for Respondents 3 & 4.

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the Petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the 5th Respondent to consider the Petitioner's Representation dated 08.08.2022 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner. Page5 of 6

¶6This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 15-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mrr To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Complex, Kancheepuram District – 631 501.

2.The District Collector, District Collector Complex, Villupuram District – 605 602.

3.Vice President and Southern Regional Manager, UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited, D-1, First Floor, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

4.Assistant Vice President and Northern Regional Manager, UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited, No.1/28, Ground Floor, Sunlight Building, Asaf Ali Road, Old Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi – 110 002.

5.The Secretary, The National Health Authority, 9th Floor, Tower I, Jeevan Bharathi Building, Cannaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. Page6 of 6

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. mrr 15-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.No.23312 of 2022 C.Annapoorani, Plot No.4, Muppathamman Nagar, Neelamangalam, Guduvanchery, Chennai – 603 202. ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Complex, Kancheepuram District – 631 501. 2.The District Collector, District Collector Complex, Villupuram District – 605 602. 3.Vice President and Southern Regional Manager, UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited, D-1, First Floor, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 4.Assistant Vice President and Northern Regional Manager, UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited, No.1/28, Ground Floor, Sunlight Building, Asaf Ali Road, Old Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi – 110 002. 5.The Secretary, The National Health Authority, 9th Floor, Tower I, Jeevan Bharathi Building, Cannaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. Page2 of 6 6.Sairam, The Chief Executive Officer, Thiru Business Services Welfare Association, & Thiru Business Service India Private Ltd., No.A-8, AVR Apartment, Bharath Madha Street, East Tambaram, Chennai – 59. 7.Shokkath Ali, The Proprietor MPS Digital E-Seva Center, No.2/252, Pudhu Nagar Main Road, Pudhu Nagar, Mannivakkam, Chennai – 600 048. and The Secretary, Thiru Business Services Welfare Association, & Thiru Business Service India Private Ltd., No.A-8, AVR Apartment, Bharath Madha Street, East Tambaram, Chennai – 59. 8.Gunasekaran, Development Officer, Thiru Business Service Welfare Association, & Thiru Business Service India Private Ltd., No.A-8, AVR Apartment, Bharath Madha Street, East Tambaram, Chennai – 59. 9.Halima, HR & Administrator, Thiru Business Services Welfare Association, & Thiru Business Service India Private Ltd., No.A-8, AVR Apartment, Bharath Madha Street, East Tambaram, Chennai – 59. ...Respondents This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the above said Respondents 1 to 5 to take an appropriate action against the above said 6, 7, 8th Page3 of 6 Respondents and their associates based on the Petitioner's Representation dated 08.08.2022 and submit the report before this Court in a stipulated time framed by this Court because they have been exploiting the hard earned money from the Public and spoiling and defaming the name of our Honourable Prime Minister and various Central Government's Welfare Schemes, particularly, the Ayushman Bharath Prathan Manthri Jan Arogya Yojana Insurance Scheme and other Central Government's Scheme. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents – 1, 2 & 5 : Mrs.S.Anitha, Special Government Pleader For Respondents – 3 & 4 : Mr.S.Vasudevan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.