Devasaran v. The State Rep by

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

21.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) and 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985, in Crime No.242 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 4

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 1 kilogram and 150 grams of ganja, which is an intermediate quantity. Hence, the case was registered.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has been roped in only for statistical purposes. It is submitted that the quantity recovered from the petitioner is only 1 kilogram and 150 grams, which is an intermediate quantity and therefore the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not apply. The learned counsel would further submit that there are totally three accused in the case and one of the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.15353 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) strongly opposed the bail application and submitted that though the recovery from the petitioner is of intermediate quantity, the petitioner is a habitual offender having six previous criminal cases, out of which one case is for the offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of the bail application.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. Page3 of 4

¶6This Court is of the view that though the quantity recovered from the petitioner is 1 kilogram and 150 grams of ganja, the criminal antecedents of the petitioner cannot be ignored. The petitioner has six previous criminal cases to his credit, including one case for the offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegation and the past criminal antecedents, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail at this stage, it would send a wrong signal to the society. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 29-06-2026 NSL To

¶1The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur South Police Station, Tiruppur District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o16408oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o16408oofo2026 29-06-2026 Page4oofo4

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Devasaran ..Petitioner Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur South Police Station, Tiruppur District. Crime No.242 of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge this petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.242 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side)