VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

J.Ismail v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 July 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 27102/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.T. Asha

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "directing the respondents to pass orders for consideration of the service seniority of the petitioners based on merit in selection to the post of Computer Instructor Grade-I (PG Cadre) in accordance with the selection list dated

11.01.2020 for the purpose of transfer counselling and other academic activities, without reference to the date of joining the service by the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the case, in consideration of representation submitted by the petitioners, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honble Court"

¶2The case of the petitioners is that they participated in the recruitment process for the post of Computer Instructor Grade-I (PG Cadre) pursuant to TRB Notification No.09/2019 dated 01.03.2019 and were selected based on merit, with their names included in the final selection list published on

11.01.2020. Though 814 candidates were selected, only 764 candidates were initially appointed on 04.01.2021, while the petitioners and other similarly Page4 of 6 placed candidates were not appointed due to pending litigations relating to alleged irregularities in certain examination centres. Pursuant to the enquiry conducted by the Committee constituted as per the direction of this Court, the allegations were found to be unsustainable. Thereafter, the petitioners were issued appointment orders through counselling held on 24.08.2021, and they subsequently joined duty on 04.09.2021.

3.The grievance of the petitioners is that the delay in their appointment was not attributable to them and, therefore, their selection seniority ought to be protected for the purpose of transfer counselling and other service benefits. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed seeking the reliefs stated supra.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records. By consent of the learned counsel on either side, the matter was taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

¶5Considering the relief sought by the petitioner and in the absence of any serious objection from the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioners' request, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page5 of 6

¶6Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SHR To

¶1The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009

¶2The Director of School Education Perasiriyar Anbazhaan Kalvi Valagam, College Road, Chennai-600 006

¶3The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary) Directorate of School Education, Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Kalvi Valagam, College Road, Chennai-600 006

¶4The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board 3rd and 4th Floors, Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.MGR Centenary Building, Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Kalvi Valaagam, College Road, Chennai-600 006 WPoNo.o27102oofo2026 P.T.ASHAoJ. SHR WPoNo.o27102oofo2026 15-07-2026 (1/2) Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

WPoNo.o27102oofo2026 INoTHEoHIGHoCOURToOFoJUDICATUREoAToMADRAS DATED:o15-07-2026 CORAM THEoHON'BLEoMS.oJUSTICEoP.T.oASHA WPoNo.o27102oofo2026 1. J.Ismail 2. S.sivaranjani 3. J.Jayameenakshi 4. K.Sivaraman 5. G.selvi 6. P.Asokan 7. R.Lakshmi 8. D.Thennarasi 9. R.Gayathri 10.J.Umarani 11.R.tamilarasi 12.S.Tiyagarajan 13.V.vijayalakshmi 14.S.Prabha 15.S.Karthiga 16.P.Vasumathi 17.M.Anandhan 18.V.sangeetha Page1oofo6 Page2 of 6 19.S.Vinoth Kumar 20.J.Kiruthika ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Director of School Education Perasiriyar Anbazhaan Kalvi Valagam, College Road, Chennai-600 006 3. The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary) Directorate of School Education, Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Kalvi Valagam, College Road, Chennai-600 006 4. The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board 3rd and 4th Floors, Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.MGR Centenary Building, Perasiriyar Anbazhagan Kalvi Valaagam, College Road, Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pass orders for consideration of the service seniority of the petitioners based on merit in selection to the post of Computer Instructor Grade-I (PG Cadre) in accordance with the selection list dated 11.01.2020 for the purpose of transfer counselling Page3 of 6 and other academic activities, without reference to the date of joining the service by the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the case, in consideration of representation submitted by the petitioners, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Sivalingam, GA for R.1 to R.3 Mr.C.Kathiravan, Standing Counsel for R4.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.