VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Maheshkumar v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 July 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP 24706/2026

Judgment

ORDER An order dated 26.03.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.

¶2Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. Page3 of 5

¶4On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle.

¶5Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised.

¶6The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RNA Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Assistant Commissioner (st) Perundurai Assessment Circle, Erode District.

¶2The Deputy State Tax Officer I Perundurai Assessment Circle, Erode District. Page5 of 5

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA and W.M.P.No.26934 of 2026 09-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.26934 of 2026 R.Maheshkumar S/o.Ramasamy, Trade Name.MK Enterprises, Sole Proprietorship Concern, GSTIN.33AUPVM2885N1ZO, S.F.No.3/8, Kunjampalayam, Vettaiyankinar, Thingalur, Erode District- 638 055. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner (st) Perundurai Assessment Circle, Erode District. 2. The Deputy State Tax Officer I Perundurai Assessment Circle, Erode District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, Calling for the entire records pertaining to the Impugned order along with summary dated 26.03.2025 issued respectively in GSTIN.33AUVPM2885N1ZO/ 2021- 22 through Reference No.ZD330325212785I under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Act, 2017 (TNGST), which was uploaded in GST portal Page2 of 5 (Online) with a demand of Rs.6,17,242.05 / - (Rupees Six Lakhs Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred and forty Two and Five Paise Only) and the Consequential order of rejection bearing GSTN.33AUEPM2885N1ZO/ 2021- 22 dated 10.06.2026 on the file of the 2nd respondent, quash the same and Consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reopen the entire proceedings and adjudicate the same after affording an opportunity of fair hearing to the petitioner by adhering to the Principles of Natural Justice. For Petitioner(s): Dr.C.E.Pratap For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) **********

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.