- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 July 2026
- Bench
- D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- CRL OP 17229/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Judgment
ORDER The prayer in this Criminal Original Petition is to direct the respondent Police to produce the silver articles which are recovered so far.
¶2The background facts, in which the case in Crime No.369 of 2025 arises, is that several persons, including the petitioner, entrusted their silver articles to the accused for polishing and without returning the same, the accused decamped with the silver articles belonging to many complainants. The grievance of the complainant is that when a portion of the silver articles has already been recovered, the same is also not produced before the Court concerned.
¶3When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondents would submit that the investigation, in this case, has already been transferred to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, CCB-Chennai, EDF-II, in view of the value involved in the case. It is further submitted that so far, approximately, 365 kgs of silver has been recovered. However, in view of the change of investigation, the new Investigating Officer has to take custody from the previous Investigating Officer and thereafter, it has to be produced before the Court concerned. Page3 of 5
¶4When the valuables have been seized, especially, the persons like the petitioner and the other complainants have lost their articles and only if the already seized articles are produced before the Court concerned, it will entitle them to move the Court concerned for interim custody of their respective articles.
¶5In view thereof, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed on the following terms:-
(i) Within two weeks from the date of receipt of a web-copy of this order, the present Investigating Officer, by following due procedure, shall take charge of the silver articles from the erstwhile Investigating Officer and immediately, within 24 hours therefrom, produce the same before the Court concerned;
(ii) Upon production of the same, the Court concerned shall deal with the same in accordance with law. 03-07-2026 PVS Page4 of 5 To
¶1The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police, Commissionerate, Vepery, Chennai
¶2The Deputy Commissioner of Police-II, CCB-Chennai, EDF II
¶3The Inspector Of Police Elephant Gate Police Station, Chennai.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o17229oofo2026 D.BHARATHAoCHAKRAVARTHY,oJ. PVS CRLoOPoNo.o17229oofo2026 03-07-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Vaibhav Marlecha ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police, Commissionerate, Vepery, Chennai. 2. The Inspector Of Police Elephant Gate Police Station, Chennai. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police-II, CCB-Chennai, EDF II. ..Respondent(s) [R3, is suo motu impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 03.07.2026.] Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd respondent to produce the recovered articles in Crime No.369 of 2025 before the Jurisdictional Court in a time bound manner and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Mohamed Ismail For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, G.A.(Crl. Side) Page2 of 5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.