VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Ramasamy v. The Principal Secretary to Government,

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 July 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WMP 27206/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.T. Asha

Judgment

ORDER This Petition has been filed to amend the prayer sought for in the original writ petition No.11933/2026. FROM "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or directing, directing the 1st Respondent to re-fix the seniority of the petitioner on par with the officers selected by the 3rd Respondent Board in the 1994-94 recruitment, based on the selection marks obtained by the petitioner in the said recruitment, based on the orders of the Supreme Court in the case of Ranjith Sigh and others Vs state of Tamil nadu in 2025 INSc 612 and consequently grant all attendant service and monetary benefits from the date of selection of the petitioner by the 3rd respondent based on the Representation of the petitioner dated 08.01.2026 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." TO THE FOLLOWING "For the reason stated in this affidavit, it is prayed that this Court direct a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction on the file of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No. 3272954 / Rect 2(2) / 2025 dated

02.02.2026 and quash the same as illegal incompetent and without jurisdiction Page3 of 4 and further direct the respondent to re-fix the seniority of the petitioner on par with the officers selected by the 3rd Respondent for the recruitment year 1994-1995, based on the selection marks as per the orders of the Supreme Court in the case of Ranjith Sighs case reported in 2025 INSC 612 together with all consequential benefits and pass further order or other orders and thereby render justice."

¶2Considering the fact that sufficient reasons have been stated in the affidavit filed in support of this amendment petition and also taking note of the fact that there is no serious objection from the respondent, this amendment petition is ordered as prayed for.

¶3The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments. 06-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SHR Page4 of 4 P.T.ASHA J. SHR To

¶1The principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009

¶2The Director General of Police Dr Radhakrishnan Salai Road, Mylapore, Chennai Tamil nadu 600 004

¶3the Tamil nadu Uniformed services Recruitment Board Represented by its Chairman (DGP), Old commissioner of Police Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore chennai 600 008 IN WP NO. 11933 OF 2026 06-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA IN WP NO. 11933 OF 2026 M.Ramasamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2. The Director General of Police Dr Radhakrishnan Salai Road, Mylapore, Chennai Tamil nadu 600 004 3. The Tamil nadu Uniformed services Recruitment Board Represented by its Chairman (DGP), Old commissioner of Police Campus, Pantheon Road, Egmore chennai 600 008 ..Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Raghavachari, Senior Counsel for Ms.V.Srimathi For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Gowthaman, AAG, Assisted by Mr.V.Prasad, GA for R.1 and R.2. Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.