VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Southern Meta Tech v. The State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 July 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP 26958/2026

Judgment

ORDER Order dated 09.12.2024 is assailed primarily on the ground that the impugned order travels beyond the scope of the show cause notice.

¶2Ms. G. Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 2.

¶3By comparing the impugned order and the show cause notice, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount demanded under the impugned order exceeds the amount mentioned in the show cause notice. Without prejudice, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the tax demanded under the show cause notice as a condition for remand. He has made an endorsement on the bundle to that effect.

¶4Subject to the petitioner remitting 50% of the tax demand in the show cause notice within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, Page3 of 4 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the first respondent for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand in the manner aforesaid. Subject to fulfillment of this condition, the attachment of the petitioner's bank account in relation to the impugned order in the third respondent bank shall stand raised.

¶5The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 27-07-2026 Index : Yes/No KJ To

¶1The State Tax Officer Padi Assessment circle Room No.426, 4th floor Integrated commercial Taxes and Registration building, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.

¶2The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Ambattur Zone PAPJM building, No.1, Greams Road Chennai-600 006. Page4 of 4

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ

¶3The Branch Manager Bank of India Anna Nagar Branch W-124, 3rd Avenue Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. and WMP.Nos.29525 & 29526 of 2026 27-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP.Nos.29525 & 29526 of 2026 Southern Meta Tech Rep by its proprietor Mr.Sambasivam Veeraraghavan No. 61B, Sathya nagar I Main road, Padi, Chennai-600 050. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The State Tax Officer Padi Assessment circle Room No.426, 4th floor Integrated commercial Taxes and Registration building, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Ambattur Zone PAPJM building, No.1, Greams Road Chennai-600 006. 3. The Branch Manager Bank of India Anna Nagar Branch W-124, 3rd Avenue Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in the impugned proceedings against the impugned order bearing Reference No. GSTIN No.33ABZPV5553D2Z3/2020- 21 dated 9.12.2024 and the consequential summary order in Form GST DRC-07 bearing Reference No.ZD331224239694D dated 27.12.2024 passed by 1st Page2 of 4 respondent under the provisions of CGST Act 2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to pass DE/NOVO order. For Petitioner: Mr. S.Lakshmi Narayanan For R1 & R2: Ms. G. Dhana Madhri Government Counsel (Tax)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.