Rajkumar v. State Rep By, the Station House Officer

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

04.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 194 of BNSS @ Sections 69, 318(4) and 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.581 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2It is the case of the prosecution that, on the promise of marriage, the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant and thereafter refused to marry her. It is further alleged that, owing to the said refusal, the defacto complainant commited suicide. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.06.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, fairly submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents and that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed.

¶5Considering the totality of the circumstances, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no bad antecedents, and also the fact that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Virudhachalam, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

02.07.2026 skr Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The learned Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Virudhachalam

¶2The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore

¶3The Inspector of Police, Vridhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr

02.07.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Rajkumar ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vridhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.581 of 2025 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.581 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)