G.Veerasami Pillai v. The District Collector

ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.04.2026 within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. Page2 of 6

¶2The case of the petitioner is that a representation dated 18.04.2026 was submitted to the respondents seeking rectification of erroneous revenue entries. The petitioner claims that the property allotted to him under a registered partition deed dated 24.09.2010, in respect of Old Survey No. 138/4A2 (New Survey No. 270/15), has been wrongly classified and included in Survey No. 270/14 as Natham Poramboke land. The representation seeks to correct the revenue records, effect the necessary mutation, and issue a patta in favour of the petitioner for an extent of 23.42 square metres. Despite the lapse of considerable time, the respondents have not considered the same till date. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for appropriate relief.

¶3Mr. B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents, submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 18.04.2026 would be considered by the 4th respondent, who is the competent authority, and appropriate orders would be passed thereon, on merits within a period of six (6) weeks. Page3 of 6

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.04.2026. The 4th respondent shall pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as any other interested parties and affording them an opportunity of a personal hearing.

¶5With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 22-07-2026 Asi Page4 of 6 To

¶1The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District Collectorate, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai 606 604

¶2The District Revenue officer Tiruvannamalai District Collectorate, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai 606 604

¶3The Revenue Divisional officer Cheyyar Revenue Division, Arcot Salai, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai 606 607

¶4The Tahsildar Vandavasi Taluk, Kottaimoolai, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai 606 604

¶5The Inspector of Survey Vandavasi Taluk, Kottaimoolai, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai 606 604 Page5 of 6 WPoNo.o28231oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. Asi WPoNo.o28231oofo2026 22-07-2026 Page6oofo6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY G.Veerasami Pillai S/o. Govindaraji Pillai, Palla Street, Padur Village, Mavalavadi post, Vandavasi Taluk, Tiruvannamalai 604 406 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District Collectorate, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai 606 604 2. The District Revenue officer Tiruvannamalai district collectorate, Vengikkal, Tiruvannamalai 606 604 3. The Revenue Divisional officer Cheyyar Revenue Division, Arcot Salai, Cheyyar, Tiruvannamalai 606 607 4. The Tahsildar Vandavasi Taluk, Kottaimoolai, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai 606 604 5. The Inspector of Survey Vandavasi Taluk, Kottaimoolai, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai 606 604 Page1 of 6 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations seeking rectification of the erroneous revenue entries whereby the petitioners property allotted under the registered partition deed dated 24.09.2010 in respect of old Survey No. 138/4A2 (New Survey No. 270/15) has been wrongly classified and included in Survey No. 270/14 as Natham Poramboke Land and consequently direct the respondents to correct the revenue records effect necessary mutation and issue patta in favour of the petitioner for an extent of 23.42 Square metres, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr. A.Arul Alex for M/s.AAA Law Firm For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government Counsel