VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Mr.Rajasekar v. Commercial Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 July 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP 25711/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner challenges an order of cancellation of GST registration. The petitioner is engaged in the business of trading in mobile, electronics and other ancillary services and was a registered person under applicable GST laws. Pursuant to a show cause notice dated 27.03.2025 stating that the petitioner had not conducted any business from the declared place of business, the impugned order was issued. According to the petitioner, he has closed the shop for renovation and therefore, he could not receive the show cause notice. The present writ petition was filed in the said facts and circumstances.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cancellation of the GST registration is causing immense hardship and that such cancellation should be revoked. In support of his contentions, he draws reference to the Judgment of this Court in Suguna Cutpiece v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), W.P.Nos.25048 of 2021 batch (Suguna Cutpiece).

¶3Ms. G. Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. She submits that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on account of the petitioner not conducting business at the registered place. She further submits that the order issued in Suguna Cutpiece was a conditional order and that the petitioner should be directed to comply with all conditions stipulated therein. Page3 of 6

¶4In Suguna Cutpiece, this Court directed restoration of GST registration subject to several terms and conditions. The said judgment was followed thereafter in many cases. In order to maintain consistency, I am inclined to follow the said judgment.

¶5In the operative portion thereof, the following directions were issued: "i. The petitioner is directed to file her returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ii. It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department. iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. v. The petitioner shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies. Page4 of 6 vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority. vii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith. viii. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax / penalty / fine. ix. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

¶6The restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the above conditions.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16-07-2026 Index : Yes/No KJ Page5 of 6 To

¶1Commercial Tax Officer Vellore (Rural) Integrated Commercial Taxes Buildings, No.4, Bharathiyar Salai, Fort Round Road, Vellore-632 001. s

¶2The Commissioner Appellate Authority (ST) Goods and Service Tax, Trichy and Vellore Division, No.4, Fort Round Road, Vellore-1. Page6 of 6

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ and WMP.No.28098 of 2026 16-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP.No.28098 of 2026 Mr.Rajasekar Proprietor of RRR TELE LINKS 214, Azad road, Thorapadi, Vellore – 632002. ..Petitioner Vs 1. Commercial Tax Officer Vellore (Rural) Integrated Commercial Taxes Buildings, No.4, Bharathiyar Salai, Fort Round Road, Vellore- 632 001. 2. The Commissioner Appellate Authority (ST) Goods and Service Tax, Trichy and Vellore Division, No.4, Fort Round Road, Vellore-1. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the order passed by the 1st respondent in Ref. No.ZA330425096194H dated 16.04.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially restore the GST registration of Petitioner vide No.33AEIPR0094P2ZZ. For Petitioner: Mr. K.Aravintha Bharathi For Respondents: Ms. G. Dhana Madhri Government Counsel (Tax) Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.