VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ramadoss v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 July 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 27301/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2022.

¶2Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 1st respondent.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 14.03.2022 before the 1st respondent, requesting them to issue patta, pertaining to the subject property. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the 1st respondent till date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 5

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation filed by the petitioner dated 14.03.2022 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. While disposing of the aforesaid representation, the respondent shall take into consideration of all the documentary evidences produced by the petitioner.

¶8With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order NSA Page4 of 5 To The Tahsildar Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Thirukazhukundram WPoNo.o27301oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. NSA WPoNo.o27301oofo2026 15-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Ramadoss S/o. Manickam, No.12 Vanniyar Street, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu district ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Thirukazhukundram 2. Perumal S/o. Dhanasu, Vanniyar Street, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu district 3. Selvaraj S/o. Sanyasi, Vanniyar Street, Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu district ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to issue patta to the petitioner in respect of the House site measuring 0.67 square meters in Grama Natham Old SF No . 29/1B1A, New SF No. 29/12 situate at Thirukazhukundram Town and Taluk, Chengalpattu district based on the judgment and decree dated 23.11.2006 passed in O.S.No. 76/ 2003 on the file of Page2 of 5 the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate court, Thirukazhukundram as confirmed by the Judgment and Decree dated 14.09.2009 passed in A.S.No. 117/ 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Chengalpattu and the judgement dated 23.12.2021 passed in secodn appeal Nos. 2910 and 2911 of 2010 on the file of the Honble High Court of Judicature at Madras, within a stipulated period For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt.counsel for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.