VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Casfish International Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner St

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 July 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP 26090/2026

Judgment

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and WMP.Nos.28486, 28488, 28491, 28493, 28496 & 28499 of 2026 In all WPs. M/s. Casfish International Pvt. Ltd. Rep by its Director Mr.Gopinath Plot No. K-33 & 34, SIPCOT Industrial Pak, 10th Main Road, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram 602105. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Sriperumbudur Assessment circle Chennai Bangalore Road, Varadharajapuram, Chennai-600 035. ..Respondent Prayer in W.P.No.26090 of 2026 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the Respondent and to quash the impugned assessment order dated 08.12.2025 bearing GSTIN no. 33AAICC0620K1Z0/2021-22 passed by the Respondent as arbitrary. Prayer in W.P.No.26098 of 2026 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the Respondent and to quash the impugned assessment order dated 02.12.2025 bearing GSTIN no. 33AAICC0620K1Z0/2021-22 passed by the Respondent as arbitrary. Page2 of 4 Prayer in W.P.No.26099 of 2026 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the Respondent and to quash the impugned assessment order dated 28.02.2025 bearing GSTIN no. 33AAICC0620K1Z0/2020-21 passed by the Respondent as arbitrary and thus render justice. For Petitioner: Mr. J Ashish For Respondent: Mr. R. Sethu Prabakaran Government Counsel (Tax) COMMON ORDER Assessment orders are assailed in these three writ petitions on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

¶2Mr. R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶3The period of limitation for filing appeals has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment order. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

¶4Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment order, as agreed to, within thirty days Page3 of 4 from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned assessment orders are set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, fresh assessment orders shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned assessment orders shall stand raised.

¶5The writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28-07-2026 (2/2) Index : Yes/No KJ To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Sriperumbudur Assessment circle Chennai Bangalore Road, Varadharajapuram, Chennai-600 035. Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. KJ and WMP.Nos.28486, 28488, 28491, 28493, 28496 & 28499 of 2026 28-07-2026 (2/2)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.