A.Chandran v. The Goverment of Tamil Nadu

__________Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ AND WP NO. 25347 OF 2023 A.Chandran S/o. S.Arukkutti, 30-A, KVS Store House, Kamatchipuram, Ondipudur Post, Coimbatore 641 016 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

¶1The Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Secretary To The Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 ..Respondent(s) WP No. 25347 of 2023 V.Devaraj S/o. Velayudham, No. 5/10 Mariyamman Koil Street, Pichanathan Village, Ongapadi Post, Anaicattu Via, Vellore District 632 102 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

¶1The Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Secretary To The Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 __________Page 2 of 4 ..Respondent(s) WP No.25346 of 2023 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give each one mark for the question Nos. 150/119, 64/117 , 12/113 , 14/16, 23/41, 18/7, 108/57, 90/138, 82/3 of master question of 2nd respondent Board/ Candidate response question and add 9 marks to the score of 76 marks obtained by the petitioner and to arrive a total of 85 marks out of 150 and declare the petitioner as passed in the Teachers Eligibility Test conducted for the year 2022 and award a pass certificate to the petitioner. WP No. 25347 of 2023 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give each one mark for the question Nos. 108/45, 82/64, 14/149, 12/102, 18/13 and 23/76 of master question of 2nd respondent Board/ Candidate response question and add 6 marks to the score of 79 marks obtained by the petitioner and to arrive a total of 85 marks out of 150 and declare the petitioner as passed in the Teachers Eligibility Test conducted for the year 2022 and award a pass certificate to the petitioner. In both Wps For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Saseetharan For Respondent(s): MR.Yogesh Kannadasan, Special Government Pleader __________Page 3 of 4 COMMON ORDER Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also circulated a letter to the Registry to that effect.

¶2Recording the submission and the letter submitted to the Registry by the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ANU To

¶1The Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Secretary To The Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 WPoNo.o25346oofo2023 MOHAMMEDoSHAFFIQoJ. ANU WPoNo.o25346oofo2023 ANDoWPoNO.o25347oOFo2023 24-03-2026 __________Pageo4oofo4