Thirumathi Vasantha Ammal v. The State of Tamilnadu

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.07.2025.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 15.07.2025 before the respondents to correct and rectify the revenue records including the Chitta, Adangal, and all other connected revenue records pertaining to survey No.133/1C situated at Vedanattham Revenue village, Kilpennathur Taluk,Tiruvannamalai District so as to correctly reflect the extent of Acres 1.25 cents on his favour and the other legal heirs of Late Ethiraj Naicker in accordance with the Registered Partition deed dated 13.03.1959 registered as Document No.967 of 1959 and to Page3 of 5 simultaneously correct the revenue records relating to survey No.133/1A so as to reflect the extent of Acres 0.83 cents in favour of the legal heirs of Late.Pichandi Naicker in conformity with the said partition Deed, while retaining without alteration the existing entry relating to survey No.133/1B measuring acres 0.14 cents, being the common well area jointly held by both families. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner's representation dated 15.07.2025 will be considered within a period of four weeks.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the third respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated

15.07.2025, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four

(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5

¶6With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM To:

¶1The Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

¶2The Revenue Divisional officer, Tiruvannamalai.

¶3The Tahsildar, Kilpennathur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶4The Village Administrative officer, Vedanattham Revenue village, Kilpennathur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. WPoNo.o27199oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. VM WPoNo.o27199oofo2026 15-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Thirumathi Vasantha Ammal ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer, Tiruvannamalai. 3. The Tahsildar, Kilpennathur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 4. The Village Administrative officer, Vedanattham Revenue village, Kilpennathur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to correct and rectify the revenue records including the Chitta, Adangal, and all other connected revenue records pertaining to survey No.133/1C situated at Vedanattham Revenue village, Kilpennathur Taluk,Tiruvannamalai District so as to correctly reflect the extent of Acres 1.25 cents in favour of the petitioner and the other legal heirs of Late Ethiraj Naicker in accordance with the Registered Partition deed dated 13.03.1959 registered as Document No.967 of Page2 of 5 1959 and to simultaneously correct the revenue records relating to survey No.133/1A so as to reflect the extent of Acres 0.83 cents in favour of the legal heirs of Late.Pichandi Naicker in conformity with the said partition Deed, while retaining without alteration the existing entry relating to survey No.133/1B measuring acres 0.14 cents, being the common well area jointly held by both families. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Varun Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Government's Counsel