VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Narayansamy v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 July 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 26891/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.06.2026.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 08.06.2026 to conduct an official survey on the aforesaid plot No.20 in survey No.507 and connected survey numbers falling within at Nanjundapuram Panchayat, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore district, to demarcate the true boundaries, prepare a mahazar with police protection to prevent any untoward incidents. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and submitted that the petitioner's representation dated 08.06.2026 will be considered within a period of six weeks.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 4

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated

08.06.2026 and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner as well as sixth respondent and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent to conduct a survey and lay boundary stones at the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court.

¶7With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The District Collector District collectorate building, Coimbatore-641018.

¶2The Tahsildar, Coimbatore north taluk office, DR.Balasundaram road, coimbatore - 641018.

¶3The Block Development Officer, Nanjundapuram panchayat, Mettupalayam road, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore -641020.

¶4The Taluk Surveyor Coimbatore north taluk office, DR.Balasundaram raod, Coimbatore - 641018.

¶5The special officer/secretary, Nanjundapuram Panchayat, Mettupalayam road, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore - 641020. 15-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Narayansamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, District collectorate building, coimbatore-641018. 2. The Tahsildar, Coimbatore North Taluk Office, DR.Balasundaram road, Coimbatore - 641018. 3. The Block Development Officer, Nanjundapuram panchayat, Mettupalayam Road, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore -641020. 4. The Taluk Surveyor, Coimbatore North Taluk Office, DR.Balasundaram raod, Coimbatore - 641018. 5. The special officer/secretary, Nanjundapuram Panchayat, Mettupalayam Road, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore - 641020. 6. C.Rajendra Prasad ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 5 to conducting an official survey of the aforesaid plot No.20 in survey No.507 and connected survey numbers falling within at Nanjundapuram Panchayat, Periyanayakkanpalayam, Coimbatore district, to demarcate the true boundaries, Page2 of 4 prepare a mahazar with police protection to prevent any untoward incidents. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Gangadaran For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Government's Counsel for R1, 2 & 4 Ms.Ramya for R3 & 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.