V.Ramya v. State Rep by the Inspector of Police

O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) and 351(2) of BNS, in Crime No.227 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the accused induced the de facto complainant to invest money by promising high returns through investment and trading activities and thereafter dishonestly misappropriated the amount without returning the investment or the promised returns. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not at all carried on any investment and trading business. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the anticipatory bail application and submitted that the total cheated amount is Rs.2,28,000/-, out of which the petitioner has repaid only Rs.50,000/-, and the balance amount is yet to be repaid.

¶5Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, particularly the fact that the entire dispute pertains to a money transaction, that the petitioner is a woman, and that, at this length of time, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner is entitled to the discretionary relief of anticipatory bail. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail, subject to the following conditions:

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

08.07.2026 cda To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Ambur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Thirupattur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

C.KUMARAPPAN, J. cda

08.07.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN V.Ramya ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Thirupattur District. (Crime No.227 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest in connection with Crime No.227 of 2026 on the file of respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Iniyavan For Respondent : Mr.N.Palanivel, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)