VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C. Madasamy v. The Regional Director of Municipal Administration (Rdma),

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 July 2026
Bench
Hemant Chandangoudarauthor
Case no.
WP 29573/2026

Judgment

O R D E R Mr. P. Siddarth, learned Government Counsel, accepts notice for the first respondent. Mr. P. Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the second respondent. Mr. Durai Gunasekaran, learned Government Counsel, accepts notice for the third respondent. Since this writ petition is being disposed of without affecting the rights of respondents 4 and 5, notice to them is dispensed with. Page Nos.3/5

¶2The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider his request for demolition of the building situated at Door No.508/32 Part, T.S. No.24, Block No.20, Ward-E, Plot No.77, G.S.T. Road, Chromepet, Chennai – 600 044, on the ground that it is old, dangerous and in a dilapidated condition.

¶3The petitioner claims to be the owner of the said commercial property. According to him, the building is about 84 years old and has become unsafe for occupation. He submitted representations dated 02.12.2024 and

27.06.2026 seeking permission to demolish the building. The petitioner further states that the building is presently occupied by two tenants. His grievance is that the said representations have not been considered till date.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that the petitioner's representations would be considered in accordance with law after conducting an inspection of the building in the presence of the petitioner and the tenants occupying the premises.

¶5Recording the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's Page Nos.4/5 representations dated 02.12.2024 and 27.06.2026 in accordance with Section 136 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Before doing so, the second respondent shall inspect the building in the presence of the petitioner and the tenants, at the petitioner's cost. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

29.07.2026 Speaking / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No mk To

¶1The Regional Director of Municipal Administration (RDMA) Chengalpattu Region Opposite New Bus Stand, Alagesan Nagar, Chengalpattu Tamil Nadu – 603 001.

¶2The Commissioner Tambaram City Municipal Corporation Commissioner's Office Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (Zone-II) Chengalpattu District.

¶3The Inspector of Police Chromepet Police Station (Station code S-13) GST Road, Chromepet, Chenani-600 044. Page Nos.5/5 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk

29.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page Nos.1/5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR C.Madasamy S/o.Chellaiya ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Regional Director of Municipal Administration (RDMA) Chengalpattu Region Opposite New Bus Stand, Alagesan Nagar, Chengalpattu Tamil Nadu – 603 001. 2. The Commissioner Tambaram City Municipal Corporation Commissioner's Office Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (Zone-II) Chengalpattu District. 3. The Inspector of Police Chromepet Police Station (Station code S-13) GST Road, Chromepet, Chennai-600 044. 4. R.Solomon 5. R.Somasundaram … Respondents Page Nos.2/5 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying a writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders for the demolition of the dangerous and dilapidated building situated at Door No.508/32 Part, T.S.No.24, Block No.20, Ward-E, Plot No.77, G.S.T. Road, Chromepet, Chennai-600 044, by exercising the powers conferred under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998, in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 02.12.2024 and 27.06.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.Shrivatsav .N For Respondents : Mr.P.Siddarth Government Counsel, for R1 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran Government Counsel, for R3 Mr.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel, for R2 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.