VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ramasamy v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 July 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 27437/2026

Judgment

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 25.05.2026.

¶2Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 4th respondent.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an application dated 25.05.2026 before the respondents, requesting them to survey the subject land and fix boundary stones therein. However, the said application was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 5

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the official respondent would submit that the petitioner's application will be disposed of within a period of 6 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 2 & 3 to consider the application filed by the petitioner dated 25.05.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the revenue officials for conducting survey at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the title/possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.

¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the revenue officials are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the 4th Page4 of 5 respondent. In such case, the 4th respondent shall provide all necessary protection to the revenue officials till the completion of survey at the subject land.

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 16-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order NSA To

¶1The District Collector Office of district collector Kalalkurichi District

¶2The Thasildhar office fo Thasildhar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District

¶3The taluk Surveyor Chinnasalem Taluk Kallakurichi District

¶4The Inspector of Police chinnasalem Police staiton, kallakurichi District WPoNo.o27437oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. NSA WPoNo.o27437oofo2026 16-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Ramasamy S/o Narayanan, No 420, kattutottakai, Thenchttiyanadal, paithiyanthurai, chinnasalem Post and Taluk, Kallakurichi District 606 201 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office of district collector Kalalkurichi District 2. The Thasildhar office fo Thasildhar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District 3. The taluk Surveyor Chinnasalem Taluk Kallakurichi District 4. The Inspector of Police chinnasalem Police staiton, kallakurichi District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to survey the property comprised SF. No 68/13 68/14, 68/15, 70/2D, 70/2D, 73/6 at Thenchttiyanandal village Chinnasalem Taluk kallakurichi District with the aid of the 4th respondent police and to fix boundary lines within a reasonable time Page2 of 5 a fixed by this honble Court by considering the application made by the petitioner dated 25.5.20216 For Petitioner(s): Mr.T. Mohanraju For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt. counsel for R1 to 3 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Govt. counsel for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.